User talk:BMcInerney8792

Welp I love getting new little messages on this talk page so leave me some wiki talk!

Hello, Brie. I hope this page is working for you! I look forward to working with you this semester! LSanford26 (talk) 19:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is working right, but hi!! Mtierney01 (talk) 19:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw a few stub articles that looked interesting : )Mtierney01 (talk) 19:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if you see something you think is interesting. If we have to work on it all semester, we should pick something we like!Mtierney01 (talk) 19:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That got me soooo confused last night. they did not make it easy to use :/ Mtierney01 (talk) 19:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!! So I think for homework due Thursday we have to post on someones talk page again..so here it goes. But I thought I'd make it productive and include the stubs I saw that seemed interesting, mostly. I think "contact high" would be interesting, because it doesn't mean the same thing that people usually mean when they say it. Also, "group attribution error" sounded neat. Finally, "hysterical contagion" and "relationship anarchy" were others that jumped out. If you see any others, I'm not attached to any of these. Feel free to let me know. We should definitely work on getting a topic solidified soon though! Mtierney01 (talk) 14:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Topic choice assignment

I think that moral psychology is too broad and too well-developed and attraction is even broader. These will be too challenging for you to make a substantial contribution. Contact high is too minor and I don’t think you’ll be able to do much with it. I think group attribution error hits the right middle ground and would be appropriate for this project.

When you refer to other Wiki articles, you should use the mark-up to link to them directly. For example moral psychology. Click the edit source on this page to see the mark-up for the link.Gseidman (talk) 21:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article feedback assignment

Useful comment on the moral psychology page.Gseidman (talk) 21:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding reference assignment

You change has been reverted by another Wikipedian due to unclear content and citation. When you cite something, you must use an established citation format with the author, title, etc. (e.g., APA style). Also, I agree with the other editor that your content was somewhat unclear. What is meant by a "light focused additional article"? This term should be clarified.Gseidman (talk) 02:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]