User talk:Batman420

You're eventually going to get Banned

...For Sockpuppeting.

As you didn't realise with any of your previous puppets, it's not going to work because they can find your IP address and because you're too much fo an idiot to realise that they will realise you're Wrestlinglover420 if you have '420' after your name and make the same edits as him. SaliereTheFish 05:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid, Sir, that there is no mention of any arc named "Death Of A Goblin" in your Source material. I have also already taken the liberty of alerting those who shot down Wrestlinglover420's last suspected Sockpuppets, who you are now listed among. Frankly, I can't imagine why your use of the word 'Harass' (which you used in your previous Talk Topic when you were pointed out as wrong) would possibly convince me. How old are you that you think sensible people will not reaise a user with the same number, editing interests and mode of writing will not be the same person? Please don't presume that you are as clever as you think you are. SaliereTheFish 13:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever dude Bendis has stated that its name will be that.Batman420 18:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can't give us any proof that you aren't Wrestlinglover, while there is a large amount of proof that youa re. You edit the same topics, you use the same dialect of English - you even have the same fascination for Cannabis - and also you went straight for the '420' bait.

Besides, none of your edits were informative or necessary, and the've mostly been reverted, so you might as well let yourself get blocked anyway.SaliereTheFish 19:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

to say that my edits wasnt informative is offensive. Who are you to decide if they are or not? All ive tried to do is make wikipedia better. You should be banned for acting the way you are. You cant tell me to stay banned. And the only edits that were reverted was by metros because he thinks im someone im not.Batman420 19:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not telling you, I'm just pointing out that most of your edits didn't make Wikipedia at all, and also that with the name you used ou were likely to get blocked under suspiscion of Sock-Puppetry anyway.

And stop pulling the 'I'm not Him' charade. The odds ae a thousand to one that two people across the world would share the exact same interests, use the exact same name extension, and even make the exact same edits.

Finally, do't try and turn this around. This is what you did wrong, not me. SaliereTheFish 20:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...And, when you are confronted with the truth, you erase it so as not to face up to it. Wise move, genius. SaliereTheFish 21:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Batman420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked because my edits are no where similar to him and the fact that i provided a link to the material. Ive been on wikipedia now for weeks. If I was actually him wouldnt I have went straight for it? Also they say that my number means i am him. Is it my fault he is a pothead to? 420 is the universal symbol for cannabis not just some jackasses number.

Decline reason:

Similar areas of interest to sock puppeteer. —dgies^t_c 05:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This isnt fair im not him!