User talk:Bedell r

Speedy deletion nomination of TTT Moneycorp

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on TTT Moneycorp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of TTT Moneycorp and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WuhWuzDat 16:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moneycorp updates

Hi Bedell r, you said:

Hi Sargdub,

I have emailed you in the past via Wikipedia regarding the information you have on Moneycorp and unfortunately received no response. The Moneycorp page has been updated to include new content and information produced by Moneycorp.

Please retain this listing as it is, the previous information was incorrect and dated, this has now been updated.

Kind regards

Bilal

Digital Marketing

Moneycorp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bedell r (talk • contribs) 15:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at the changes you added in and it seems too promotional plus you deleted the infobox without explanation. Please note that a lot of the language is too promotional see WP:PROMOTION to get an idea what is acceptable and the references are poor as they often refer to monycorps own web site rather than good third party sources. I have reverted the version but have pulled back in some of the facts from your version that are noteworthy, hopefully this covers the updates you rever to. I encourage you to add anything else you feel is important, but please read the wikipedia policies particularly WP:CONFLICT and make sure you keep edits neutral and relevant. Sargdub (talk) 05:49, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]