User talk:Berane

Oh, come on...

Are we going to see another bunch of sockpuppets like few months ago?

How stupid people have to be to believe that you are not a sock-puppet? Just this spring we had a zillion sock puppets on exactly the sam article you are vandalising now! I guess you are going to dissapear later today and open another sock puppet?

--Ante Perkovic 00:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, you and I know that this guy was beaten because he was taking pictures of naked kids on the beach in the middle of pedofile scandal in Croatia. Not because he was Dutch. Dutch who don't take picturs of naked kids don't get beaten here. You know that, but you just like spreading anti-croatian propaganda. you are not the first not the last one.

Another thing... the thing with those 2 british guys is steal unclear. some people says that they started the fight themselves. some even say that they provoked the fight by grabing somebody's ass.

Also, I find higgly unlikely that so many people chose Tourism in Croatia as a first article that they edit in wikipedia. It's more like we are dealing with just one person with high level of croatophobia. Right?

--Ante Perkovic 01:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch guy

Please, answer this simple question:

A dutch photographer take picture of people on the beach. Some of them are kids, propably naked or half-naked. Two local guys came and saw this. They might even didn't know the guy is Dutch. Important detail is that there was a great deal of talk about pedophilia on national TV - some guy get caught while molesting some kids few days before, or smt. like that.

Now, two guys, generally pissed of at pedophiles, saw a guy taking pictures of kids on the beach. Note that they don't see famous photographers taking pictures of the people on the beach every day, so it's not like they have a big experience with photographers. The reasonably (or not, whatever) assume that thi guy is a pedophile and the attach him (or just try to take his camera, I don't know for sure).

Not, be honest - does this says 'anything about people in Croatia and their feelings towards other nations? What do you say?

--Ante Perkovic 01:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gay pair

Evo ti google - http://www.google.hr/search?hl=hr&q=gay+par+hvar+carpe+diem&btnG=Tra%C5%BEi&meta= - pa vidi na koliko mjesta piše da nidu krili da su gay par. Sad budi toliko dobar pa varti onaj moj tekst, ja više nemam vremena - idem offline. --Ante Perkovic 01:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good

Now, this is good. Of course, now that we reached the point of compromise, every reader will see the information of a tourist being mistaken for a pedofile as a quite an unimportant event. Someone might get impresion that Croatia is extremely peaceful country if biggest problem here is guy being mistaken for a pedofile after taking pictures of kids on the beach. I don't know if this was your intention, but I like the result. Thanks! Good night. --Ante Perkovic 02:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nizozemac-v.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nizozemac-v.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 14:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]