User talk:Bigpoopguy4
May 2010
[edit]
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of protest marches on Washington, D.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Bigpoopguy4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't see why I was blocked. All I did was put in the correct numbers for the 9/12/09 taxpayer march on Washington D.C., with citations and references, with no biased, violent, offensive, or otherwise inappropriate marterial. Can you explain what I did wrong?
Decline reason:
Replacing statistics that have been verified by a reliable, independent source with incorrect information is vandalism. In order to keep Wikipedia accurate, vandals are blocked. If you make similar edits when your block expires, you can expect your block to be much longer, or indefinite. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bigpoopguy4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
ABC News is not a Reliable Source. They are extremly Liberally biased. Other sources show Tea Party numbers at the March on Washington in September 12th, 2009 at near 1 or 2 million. I gave a reliable source. Now tell me, what is the problem?
Decline reason:
By your logic, FOX News is unusable as a source either because it is extremely conservatively biased. Get used to seeing sites that don't cater to your POV as reliable sources; their journalistic integrity is what makes them reliable. That means blogs, like Berman Post, are not reliable sources whatsoever. In addition, your username is an issue, meaning that irrespective of the merits of the content dispute which led to your block (which we have very little power to intervene in anyways), you will need to request a name change on your next unblock request ({{unblock-un|<your new name here>}}). Declined. —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 02:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bigpoopguy4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I' not going to talk to an obvious philistine about the bias of news networks. My point is, the real number are much higher, as reported on: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1213056/Up-million-march-US-Capitol-protest-Obamas-spending-tea-party-demonstration.html http://84rules.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/crowd-size-from-the-912-march-on-washington-dc/ Washington D.C. Park Service http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/12/tea-party-express-takes-washington-storm/ http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2009/09/conservative-woodstock-rocks-the-capital/ http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/09/12/2000000-march-on-washington/ http://dailyuprising.com/blog/random-thoughts/giant-9-12-link-a-thon-links-to-stories-photos-and-attendance-statistics-from-across-the-net/ http://www.thepoliticalclass.com/2009/09/15-million-tea-party-protesters-march-on-washington-dc-today-912-protest-grows.html www.Freedom Works.com And your going to trust an unpopular, far left organization?
Decline reason:
WP:NPA's in an unblock request will almost always lead to the removal of talkpage access for the duration - which I am doing(talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Based on your username, 24 hours from now, you will need to file an {{unblock-spamun}}, but only if you feel you can contribute properly around here. Until then you will not be able to access your talkpage due to the above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- There's no reason to think that ABC News has the 'liberal bias' that you claim. All the sources you list, however, have a outspokenly conservative bias- it isn't a hidden bias; most of them are blogs with an openly conservative point of view. Until you can find a source that is unbiased that confirms the larger number, you should not be so quick to trust that number. ...was this the march that FOX News reported on while showing film, not of the march, but of the crowds at the Obama inauguration? I thought that was funny, but not necessarily meant to be used as a legitimate source. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)