User talk:Billrjones

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Collatz conjecture, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have contributed other material for which no source was cited. Why is this different?

Billrjones (talk) 23:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your only other contributions appear to be to graph coloring, and were also immediately removed for the same reason. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I now believe that I have NOT committed "original research" in my contribution to graph coloring. I am prepared to cite "reliable, published sources" as deemed necessary. Please restore my contribution. Billrjones (talk) 06:50, 25 June 2021 (UTC) Billrjones (talk) 06:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does Wikipedia have any sites that welcome original thought?
Billrjones (talk)