User talk:Black Nickel

Proposed deletion of FancyJ London

Hello, Black Nickel. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, FancyJ London, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want FancyJ London to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Ueutyi (talk) 00:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FancyJ London

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FancyJ London, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —azuki (talk · contribs · email) 00:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need help?

Not sure how to work this wikipedia contribution?Black Nickel (talk) 01:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Black Nickel (talk) 01:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve FancyJ London

1. Add at least one reliable source, i.e. a source that directly supports what you are saying.

2. Abridge contents on the page. It's confusing to read.

3. Break the page into sections. Use ==title== to open a section, and use ===title=== to open a subsection.

4. Consult the Manual of Style and WP:BLP for how to make your article look like an authentic article.

5. Avoid using words that favor your subject. An encyclopedia article should be written in a neutral point of view.

Thank you. Ueutyi (talk) 01:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]