User talk:Blackdogfoundation

AfD nomination of Blackdog foundation

An editor has nominated Blackdog foundation, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackdog foundation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Blackdog Foundation

As you can see from the AfD link, (or as you can read here, if you didn't check the automated message) it was agreed that the article cited no verifiable, reliable, third party, non trivial published sources, and, as none were provided or found, it was decided that the subject was non notable per the rules at WP:CORP. It is generally considered bad for companies or individuals to write about themselves, as explained at WP:AUTO, so I would not reccomend rewriting the article. Feel free to contact me if I can be of any help. J Milburn 16:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Please be aware that your username is in violation of our user name policy as it counts as spam. Please change it as explained here, otherwise you could be blocked without notice. J Milburn 16:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]