User talk:Blakeusa

Welcome...

Hello, Blakeusa, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some useful pages to help you get started:

I hope you'll enjoy contributing as much as I do. When posting on discussion pages, please sign your messages. To do this, type four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

You are seeing this because in my patrols for vandalism, I saw you had edited a page. I also noticed that your talk page (this page) had a red link. That meant that the talk page didn't exist yet. I am sorry you can't eat the cookies, but they are still fresh. If you find a way to enjoy them, let me know. Will (Talk - contribs) 07:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not blank properly sourced information from Wikipedia, as you recently did.[1] In addition, please do not make hostile comments towards other editors in edit summaries. I am also going to warn the other editor not to antagonize you. Please make use of the article talk page, or dispute resolution to resolve your differences. Thank you. Jehochman ^Talk 01:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not blank sourced information from articles.[2] This is probably your last warning before you get blocked. Jehochman ^Talk 01:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lyme disease. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Acroterion _(talk) 02:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lyme disease

Please stop blanking sourced information from Lyme disease. Disruption such as this is blockable. Particularly, if you think you are right and that you can convince rational people of this, it would be far better to engage in a talk page discussion. Antelan ^talk 02:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Lyme friends

A tag has been placed on Lyme friends, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tckma (talk) 16:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]