User talk:Blogger89

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Orderinchaos 12:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Bligh

Please consider Wikipedia:FORUM. Nuβiατεch ^Talk 12:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Anna Bligh. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Nuβiατεch ^Talk 13:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anna Bligh. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Q ^{T C} 13:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Anna Bligh. EdBever (talk) 13:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Q ^{T C} 13:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended this to an indefinite block. You're clearly only here to promote a strong POV and attack others, rather than contribute in a collegial fashion. Orderinchaos 03:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]