User talk:Blort

Reardonesque

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Reardonesque, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Wafulz 22:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to have to provide reliable sources for that article too, or else it will be deleted. Articles on Wikipedia need to be verifiable and meet notability guidelines- the applicable guideline for this topic is Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms. Assuming that this neologism is notable, it would be better served as a sentence in the subject's article.-Wafulz 23:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In lieu of any reliable sources, I've put it up for a more formal deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reardonesque.-Wafulz 02:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Reardonesque

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Blort! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule example\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 23:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]