User talk:BlueworldSpeccie

Speedy deletion declined

Hi BlueworldSpeccie. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Cultural Beira, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, under criterion G3 because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks!. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikicology: Good day. I have a few questions. Why would it not qualify for G3? It seems like obvious vandalism to me. The sources don't have anything to do with the article. (I am not arguing with you. I genuinely have some questions) BlueworldSpeccie (talk) 15:41, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing my attention back to this. The page is an obvious hoax, now tagged for speedy deletion per G3. Its actually not Vandalism but hoax (misinformation). So sorry for my previous notice, I was earlier distracted with irrelevant discussion outside Wikipedia. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikicology: Alright I understand. But when I go to the page it says template not found? Why would it do that? BlueworldSpeccie (talk) 22:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

use "db-hoax instead of "Db-hoax" or "Db-G3. Tag it like {{db-hoax}}. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:57, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ironically, the page was was nominated for deletion on 16 May 2008. The result of the discussion was closed without decision. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BlueworldSpeccie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]