Vietnamese vs. North Korean Migration

North Korean defectors who migrate to China face difficulties due to the changing politics of the Republic *more explanation of "The Republic"*. China’s non-admission policy regarding whom are to be considered as defectors stands in sharp contrast with its generosity of Vietnamese refugees in the late 1970s and the Orderly Departure Program (ODP)

Orderly Departure Program

The Chinese government took oversight of *assimilation* programs and granted equal status to Vietnamese migrants in 1979. Over the past thirty years, nearly 300,000 residents of Vietnam have migrated to China under refugee status as a result of the deterioration of Sino-Vietnamese *more explanation* relations *between who?*. Not only did the Chinese government allot time for various agencies to examine refugees’ backgrounds and labor skills, but refugees were allowed to live in China indefinitely. Researchers set out to understand the *differentiating* criteria between the neighboring communist countries to find a *pragmatic*, modern solution.

Chinese--North Korean Politics

With Vietnamese migration decreasing, China permitted the *expand and link this* UNHCR to establish an office in Beijing in 1995. However, the fragile diplomatic ties between playing as buffer China for North and South Korea encourages the *repatriation* of North Korean refugees. In order to keep the regime stable, China claims it has tried to avoid *exacerbating* the refugee crisis by implementing policies restricting migration towards North Koreans coming to China. To the North Korean regime, communication of China with South Korean citizens is considered political rebellion.

Political Tension

The protection of the Chinese persons from external threats bears weight. China has banned the UNHCR direct access to North Koreans, claiming that the issue is more of an internal matter and should be treated as so. A *spell out and link* CRS Report for Congress in 2007 argues that behind-the-scenes discussions among Pyongyang and Beijing *link these places* are the most effective way to improve human rights in North Korea. By staying discrete, the threat of interfering with internal affairs would be *alleviated*. Other analysts suggest that North Korea reintroduce a program similar to the Vietnamese ODP. (Robinson 53-55) This initiative to promote separated households to reunite with the country state of interest in mind.*the previous sentence doesn't make a whole lot of sense, I'm not really sure what you're trying to say* UNHCR has declared all North Koreans in China to be 'persons of concern', although China does not recognize North Koreans' claims to asylum as valid.

Article 3.25

CHINA -- POSTING IN ODP WIKIPEDIA PAGE INSTEAD Although less noted than other countries, China participated in the Orderly Departure Program, accepting about 260,000 Vietnamese persons. (citation) They were provided refugee status and most settled in southern China where they were well integrated and received protection from the Chinese government. Not only did the Chinese government allot time for various agencies to examine the refugees’ background and labor skills. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, not as many Vietnamese are migrating to China. However today, China refuses to accept people that the country views as defectors from other Communist countries. 18:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)~ China -- North Korean Defectors page North Korean defectors who migrate to the People’s Republic of China face difficulties due to the Republic’s altering its migration platform in the 1990s. China’s non-admission policy regarding who may be considered a defector, not refugee, stands in sharp contrast with the nation’s participation in the Orderly Departure Program (insert link)

There have been large-scale flows of displaced persons from neighboring country, North Korea since the 1990s. The Chinese government does not recognize North Korean defectors as refugees, but rather as illegal economic migrants. Researchers set out to understand the differentiating criteria between the Communist countries to find a pragmatic, modern solution for North Korean defectors. The Ministry of Public Security adopted the Exit and Entry Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China on June 30, 2012. In compliance with China’s role in the UNHCR (insert link), articles 20 and 46 incorporates refugees and asylum seekers. Stating that those “who need to enter China urgently for humanitarian reasons” must apply for visas prior to departure and that the Ministry of Public Security should be responsible for matter relevant to refugee status. The protection of the Chinese persons from external threats bears weight. China has banned the UNHCR direct access to North Koreans, claiming that the issue is more of an internal matter and should be treated as so. A CRS Report for Congress in 2007 argues that behind-the-scenes discussions among Pyongyang and Beijing are the most effective way to improve human rights in North Korea.[4] By staying discrete, the threat of interfering with internal affairs would be alleviated. Other analysts suggest that North Korea reintroduce a program similar to the Vietnamese ODP. [5](Robinson 53-55) This initiative to promote separated households to reunite with the country state of interest in mind. UNHCR has declared all North Koreans in China to be 'persons of concern', although China does not recognize North Koreans' claims to asylum as valid. With Vietnamese migration decreasing, China permitted the UNHCR to establish an office in Beijing in 1995. [2] However, the fragile diplomatic ties between playing as buffer China for North and South Korea encourages the repatriation of North Korean refugees. [3] In order to keep the regime stable, China claims it has tried to avoid exacerbating the refugee crisis by implementing policies restricting migration towards North Koreans coming to China. To the North Korean regime, communication of China with South Korean citizens is considered political rebellion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmacmul (talk • contribs) 18:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]