User talk:Bmg916/Archive5
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bmg916. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hulk Hogan's wrestlemania 23 match
Hi. I have put in some notable information about Hulk Hogan. I mentioned the following;
Hulk Hogan was supposed to have his fifth run and wrestle The Big show at Wrestlemania 23 but that match could not happened because of Big Show's retirement. The Big Show was then replaced by The Great Khali to be Hulk Hogan's opponent but due to paying disputes between Hulk Hogan and Vince McMahon, that match did not happen. As the result of that, Hulk Hogan's was replaced by Kane who did bodyslammed to The Great Khali which was what Hulk Hogan did to the late Andre The Giant twenty years earlier at Wrestlemania III.
During the Memphis Wrestling section, I mentioned:
The match between The Big Show and Hulk Hogan was the match that should have happened at Wrestlemana 23 and what the WWE could not deliver. These important message had been removed. Message me back. Thank you. Iron Scorp 18:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hulk Hogan (Memphis Wrestling)
Hi. I have watched the match and the promo of Hulk Hogan vs. Paul "The Great" Wight in Memphis Wrestling. In the promo, Hulk Hogan mentioned that he was going to repeat history by lifting up Paul Wight over the head and slammed him for the victory after the leg drop. Paul Wight said in the promo that he was not going to let Hulk Hogan let history repeat itself by letting Hulk Hogan slamming Paul Wight. Hulk Hogan also mentioned that he was going to show his son and his daughter what he did to Andre The Giant at Wrestlemania III by doing the same to Paul Wight. The Wrestlemania III was mostly talked about while both Hulk Hogan and Paul Wight were doing the promo. All of the ring announcers have mentioned that the match that both Hulk Hogan and the Big Show had was the match that the WWE could not deliver. So as the result of that, even though the match should have happened at Wrestlemania 23, it happened at the Memphis wrestling's PMG Clash Of The Legends instead. Both the PMG Clash Of The Legends and Wrestlemania 23 pay-per-view happened in the same month of April. I think it is notable to add more points that Hulk Hogan made history again by slamming Paul "The Giant" Wight and beat him like how he beat Andre The Giant. Thank You. Iron Scorp 18:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Improvements
Hi. Can you spread the word for me that I have the evidence for the WWE World Heavyweight Championship being inherited by the WCW World Heavyweight Championship. It mentioned on the website: www.WrestleLine.com. Thank you. Iron Scorp 18:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever WrestleLine says doesn't mean anything. They are seperate titles. TJ Spyke 23:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Isn't The Undertaker's middle name William? The Prince of Darkness 15:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. I'll remove William from the Norwegian Wikipedia. The Prince of Darkness 19:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
ECW TCC and L2K
L2K has got a bee in their bonnet with regard to RVD, the consensus was reached two months ago, I've reverted it, you've reverted it, and I said that L2K should take it to the WP:PW talk page, and he/she has, I've commented, if you could throw your two cents in it may help to convice he/she that this is not just some personal crusade that I have. Darrenhusted 20:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Cheers for posting, the debate is at least on the main project page rather then in the edit summary boxes for each revert. The status of the US title and ECW title are both headaches in terms of the TCC and GSC pages, and it's good to know that someone else understands the current status. Darrenhusted 13:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Whilst we at Wikipedia appreciate all contributions, please don't be under any illusion that 1 person has the last word on everything. We are all here to make this site great. Do not refer to users cointributions as vandalism just because you don't think a result should be there.
Thanks for enjoying the site and we appreciate your contributions andd enthusiasm
You're invited!
Autograph
Since, we BOTH like wrestling, can you sing in my autograph book? BATMANrules677 01:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Hulk hogans wrestlemania 23 match
How do you know this ?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Aguilar (talk • contribs)
Hardy Boyz
Why do you keep deleting my edit? Jay316 21:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Jay316 is reverting my reverts of your revert, I don't want to be caught in a 3RR. Darrenhusted 22:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
The Shelly Martinez dispute.
There is an edit war happening on the Shelly Martinez page which could use some assistance in solving. Could you please help resolve the dispute? It is basically an external links conflict. I also feel that user KingOfDaBurbs is claiming ownership of the article. I'm not entirely sure if you are an admin or not, but I'm aware of your contributions which is why I asked for your help. - Deep Shadow 09:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
John Cena
I'm going to assume that was an accident?«»bd(talk stalk) 03:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Undertaker
Is undertaker coming back in a new pesona—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Aguilar (talk • contribs)
A proposal re: Vandalism Templates
Hi there! I noticed that you recently warned a user who is inserting comments such as "is openly gay" with the {{subst:uw-defamatory}} template. I'm hoping that you will consider using {{subst:uw-vandalism}} or {{subst:uw-test}} templates instead, because the labelling of such vandalism as defamatory reinforces the idea that being thought of as gay is a bad thing. Thanks for your consideration!--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 01:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
wwefan980talk
- Why do you keep changing my talk page? Wwefan980 02:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Why can't I edit my own talk page to how I want? I didn't know it was against conduct.... Wwefan980 02:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I understand about the talk now, thanks for explaining things. Also, no problem on the autograph thing. :) Wwefan980 02:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Glad you will help, because I am sure I will encounter future difficulties. I appreciate your guidance thus far. Wwefan980 02:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I understand about the talk now, thanks for explaining things. Also, no problem on the autograph thing. :) Wwefan980 02:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Why can't I edit my own talk page to how I want? I didn't know it was against conduct.... Wwefan980 02:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
There's a difference between editing freely and editing to contribute. If the edit is not incorrect, then is there something wrong with putting it there? And I think this warning needs to be changed to Don't add rumors or speculation, but the week by week event thing can't be enforced if you ask me. Does that sound like a compromise? And if I am blanking something that prevents editing from other users when Wikipedia needs editing to function, then it doesn't matter. But I won't for now on, I will change the week by week warning(not the rumors and speculation) just as you will blank the edits other users put. So don't come at me like that, because in reality you contradict yourself and if you say we should come to an agreement then maybe you should quit asserting yourself as if you will always be the one to get the better end of an agreement or just be in full charge of an edit(s). Wwefan980 16:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
What if someone was wanting to read about a wrestler and they couldn't because you freely move what you FEEL is not notable? I know this is not a wrestling news site, but thats like saying we can't put anything that is news about anything has an edit. I am not going to speak to the WP:PW page people, because I am going to follow what Wikipedia tells me and that's all I need to abide by. It's that simple. Wwefan980 22:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Also about the reliability thing, I think that you need to put a source in your little warning if you want to say that. Also, I didn't verify anything because I didn't know if it was verified or not, but I just edit it like it already is basically. I think that the whole Umaga article needs to be deleted then.(But let's stay on our other subject, we can discuss this later if you'd like) Wwefan980 22:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I was wanting the thing at the top(in yellow background) that says "If you leave me a message I will reply on your talk page"(or something like that) if you would want to do that for my talk page. Wwefan980 19:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for that! Wwefan980 00:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Why do you keep changing my edits to what you please? I think we need to settle this once and for all. In addition, don't report me for vandalism(because it isn't) because I could do just the same to you. Oh yeah, why are you dodging what I said about the Wikipedia telling me to do thing rule? You aren't an administrator. Wwefan980 03:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah well I tried to talk to them Wrestling Project deal and winded up getting cussed at. If someone has to resort to cursing in order to get a point across or because they are mad, why should I have to agree or come to terms with such a person? Why don't you go ahead and report me then, because I am not doing anything wrong. The wrestling project is scaring people with these warnings and going against the whole point of Wikipedia in general. People in that wrestling project seem pretty rude and think they are king of Wikipeda apparently based on what I have read on their talk page and about them. If I am not doing anything wrong, then you have no reason to report me. Like I said, I can't come to any type of consensus with such rude and power hungry people. Let there be edit change after edit change(I am not going to edit today probably, kind of busy), because I am being perfectly fine with my edits and they are less intimidating yet still try to enforce the Wikipedia policy. Wwefan980 14:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah okay. If you say I should follow guidelines that aren't even exactly rules(which even so what I am doing isn't stated on the page of what Wikipedia isn't), then I think you should do the same. In that, that means that you need to follow this article, what vandalism is not so you can see what I am doing is fine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_vandalism_is_not Wwefan980 17:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Listen, who is to say other editors aren't being disruptive to me? Well they are, but are they doing anything wrong? Apparently not by your standards. Wwefan980 20:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for stopping at 3 reversions and choosing not to violate the 3RR. Please discuss changes on the talk page! If edit warring continues, i may protect the page. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Candice
Im NOT adding week by week events im just adding the match she won against melina (with sources) it shows that the feud between them is continuing.. Why you went off & got someone to tell me off I will never no, just get over the fact that melina lost, I added ONE week NOT week by week which shows she beat the womens champion!!! well from now on i will not contribute to my fav wwe diva to improve the article by adding ONE week by week thanks alot! :( Beck 15:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Don't worry I think this user is bothering everyone who edits the wrestling articles in a matter in which he does not like. Just keep editing. Wwefan980 15:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- This issue has been resolved, please do not be disruptive and troll on my talk page. Thank you. Bmg916SpeakSign 16:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Dude quit acting like you are superior I told the truth and if you want to be like that quit disrupting me and harassing me. Wwefan980 22:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
Thanks for the barnstar! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I not new
I am not new to Wikipedia and I was fully aware of my actions on the WWE roster page. I forgot to mention it on an edit comment, but I did explain my reasoning on the talk page. There seemed to be a consensus against the flags without any visible opposition, but no one was taking any action on their discussions about removing the flags. Sevenzeroone says: Poopy is not fun! 03:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
You know those trolls from the Mania III article?
Well I found them. [1] And boy do they hate me and TJ (Mostly me because their trolling, nonsense, theories, speculations, original research, and vandalism gets reverted XD), but still... The last thing Wikipedia needs right now are bunch a net trolls flaming the project. I've been dealing with two users from the board on the Big Gold Belt article that keep adding the same crap that they're mad at me for removing. Do you believe the Big Gold Belt was believed to been crafted by a cowboy belt buckle maker out of Reno, Nevada? I thought so... Do you think this OR warning is "bogus" when no source was provided? Thought so too. These trolls are getting on my nerves now. Not that I'm not used to dealing with trolls like these before (i.e. User:Big foot123456789, User:JB196 <- the guy who's been making all these troll come here, User:Jrapidfire, User:Wiki-star) but one troll a month is one too many for me. -- bulletproof 3:16 05:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
RE:Your talk page
Yeah I was wanting the thing at the top(in yellow background) that says "If you leave me a message I will reply on your talk page"(or something like that) if you would want to do that for my talk page. Wwefan980 19:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for that! Wwefan980 00:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:PW Warnings
Thanks for the props. I actually have been reading the following discussion as your user page has been in my watchlist ever since my question about Shelly Martinez. Speaking of which, yes, it has been resolved. I think it just happened naturally. Thanks again. - Deep Shadow 17:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Socks
User:Symbiotic Dresscode - does not make much of an attempt to hide it does he? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)