User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2012/July
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Brewcrewer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your Reversion Reason given -- 'invalid reason. basis for non-inclusion is amply explained'
"invalid reason" being what and explained where?
The article does not accurately convey what the source says. The tag was appropriate, in fact recommended procedure. The article section is under discussion at Talk for this exact issue.. Please undo thx talknic (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Meir Kahane
"Loss of nationality" is indeed the proper legal term for what happened: 8 U.S.C. § 1481. The other word you're looking for is "renounce", not "denounce"; one does not lose nationality by insulting or decrying it. quant18 (talk) 00:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- You would probably need non-statute sources that apply "loss" to a renunciation of citizenship. It doesn't make sense from a simple grammar aspect and its usage as a legal statute means little for a mainstream encyclopedia. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:22, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
No thanks
You are so busy with life, you have time to welcome IPs ?! In any case, I have had lousy (thanks to dhRaul for the word) experiences with Wikipedia before, so not interested in being a "wikipedian" so I can take all the crap from people that barely speak English or have yet to loose their virginity. As the participation in Wikipedia declines, the admins can look forward to sleeping less, and reflecting more on all the people blocked from editing who didn't really deserve their fingers on the right mouse button just because they could Oh, and in case you don't like this, don't bother blocking me. If I find that you had, I'll just change the IP address, which I didn't know how to do before 220.238.42.127 (talk) 14:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
Issue at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement in regards to SHamir. You may be interested as were aware of the dipsute.Lihaas (talk) 12:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Ovadia Yosef
Ovadia Yosef is obviously a racist - indeed, an anti-HUMAN bigot. Consider his statements regarding the subhumanity of gentiles. He would make a Nazi blush. DOWN WITH RACISM, and all its supporters on Wikipedia. 46.11.112.223 (talk) 23:59, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- "gentiles" are not a race.He speaks of the superiority of his religion just like the leaders of any other religion.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
IP Address vandalism
There is no need to revert the IP address' vandalism any further. He has been warned multiple times by multiple users and his conduct is terrible. If he continues, I will simply file a request against him. But don't get into an edit war. --Activism1234 01:52, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- See [1] --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:53, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ah. Is the comments section for admins only, or can I comment with more info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Activism1234 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Anyone can comment.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ah. Is the comments section for admins only, or can I comment with more info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Activism1234 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)