User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2018/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Brewcrewer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
1984(magazine) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1984(magazine). Since you had some involvement with the 1984(magazine) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Brewcrewer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Briarcliff
I'm disputing your edit because it's not contributive. The division is a well-established term, with over 3,900,000 hits. This is directly from the The U.S. Office of Management and Budget: please see New York metropolitan area#Definitions for the definitions and breakdowns.
Specificity is not a bad thing, nor are there any typos or unsourced content there; that's an excuse or lie or something else. This Featured Article went through extensive reviews by the most experienced of Wikipedians, and they appreciated this level of detail. ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 17:56, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Stick to article talk page, not here, and please don't insult my intelligence with ghits of searches that are not in quotes. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Brewcrewer: you're not acting civilly here; I'll ask you to watch your behavior. I'm not acting hostile here, neither should you. I wrote on your talk because I wouldn't presume that you watchlisted that article, and because my problem is with you, not with the article in general. ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 04:50, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- You should get out more often. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:17, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Brewcrewer: you're not acting civilly here; I'll ask you to watch your behavior. I'm not acting hostile here, neither should you. I wrote on your talk because I wouldn't presume that you watchlisted that article, and because my problem is with you, not with the article in general. ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 04:50, 24 November 2018 (UTC)