User talk:Brockjaw

Welcome!

Hello, Brockjaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Scientizzle 00:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From Talk:Joshua Crosley

[[Jazz-Funk may be an obscure genre, but it should be allowed equal coverage on Wikipedia. Many people have expressed an interest in Joshua Crosley's life and work in the Jazz-Funk online newsletters and publications. Thus I think this page is wholly justified and compliant with Wikipedia's general aims.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brockjaw (talk • contribs).

I feel this article has been unfairly treated and it would be very much appreciated if it would be left alone.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brockjaw (talk • contribs).

Please see WP:BIO & WP:MUSIC, the notability guidelines concerning biographies and musical groups, respectively. If an article can't assert sufficient, verifiable notability, it meets the criteria for speedy deletion. -- Scientizzle 00:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're a beast. The issue of Underground Action magazine that contains the article is clearly cited, which surely constitutes 'verifiable notability'..—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brockjaw (talk • contribs).

If you would like to contest the deletion, feel free to take it up at WP:Deletion review. Underground Action magazine does not have an article and receives no Google hits[1], so your case for notability is very weak. -- Scientizzle 01:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist... Brockjaw 01:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never said it doesn't exist, I merely stated that a claim from an apparently non-notable magazine does little to improve the liklihood of this article staying around. -- Scientizzle 01:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have a rather small penis!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brockjaw (talk • contribs).

Riiight. Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Scientizzle 01:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:Tom harrison, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Scientizzle 01:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thats rather childish!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brockjaw (talk • contribs).

Yes, it is childish, and it does not help your case. If you know enough to redirect my user page, you know enough not to. If you engage in any more vandalism you will likely have your editing priviledges suspended. Tom Harrison ^Talk 01:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Tom Harrison ^Talk 01:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]