User talk:Bycycleinc
Bicycle saddle[edit]
Hi, as I see that am the first person to leave a note on your talk page I'd like to welcome you to wikipedia, and to thank you for contributing. All to often I find myself talking to other users when there is a dispute and not when we agree on something. Unfortunately this is an example of that.
I'll leave details of the issue in question on the talk page of the bicycle saddle article, but more generally I'd recommend reading these help pages:
- Help:Edit summary especially note:
"Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved. This creates an atmosphere where the only way to carry on discussion is to revert other editors! If you notice this happening, start a section on the talk page and place your comments there. This keeps discussions and debates away from the article page itself."
I request you to stop reverting my edits without discussion on the talk page. I'd also like you to clarify the relationship between you and the company who's promotional picture you keep putting up. Thanks!--Keithonearth (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Keithonearth and others,
I would be happy to resolve our differences in an off line forum.
You posted unverifiable information that I edited out and which you continued to insist is acceptable text. How do you suggest we resolve this and other unverifiable claims in the section text?
You continue to not allow the picture of the BiSaddle to exist along with others in the section in spite of it meeting the Wikipedia requirements for pictures. If there are specific requirements for this section or otherwise within Wikipedia that provide further clarification, please advise. You have not responded to my questions about the "requirements" for inclusion in the picture sub-section. Please do so in a manner such that we can move forward to resolution on this.
As I have stated earlier, it is my intention to see that this section on Bicycle Saddles in Wikipedia reflect clearly the findings of our government scientists about bicycle saddle design and the truth that the facts are not being reported accurately elsewhere. I believe that it is the purpose of Wikipedia to counteract bias from other sources and expect it to live up to its reputation. If you have concerns about my intent or suggestions about how this information is best integrated into the section, please advise so we can resolve our differences before more editing takes place.