Please don't "Pockmark"
I'm not going to revert your recent edits on Xmas at the moment, but in general, if you have problems with an unsourced paragraph, then tag the paragraph as a whole, or strategic locations in the paragraph, instead of tagging up every single clause (principal or subordinate) in the paragraph. The resulting proliferation of templates impairs readability, and it's doubtful whether it really does anything additional to meaningfully call attention to potential problems. AnonMoos (talk) 11:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, CNJECulver, talk pages are a record of what has been discussed regarding the article. Please do not remove discussions. When the talk page becomes too lengthy to be able to read in a timely manner and difficult to find things, sometimes they can be archived, but they are linked from the main talk page. Please do not alter other editors' comments, particularly by deleting them. If you wish to remove your own, please strike them out using <s> </s> tags. Thanks. --Moni3 (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- This link is the edit where you commented and erased, interestingly, everything before the "erroneously" discussion, and everything after. An apology is not necessary, just caution.
- For most Wikipedians, if they leave you a message on your talk page, they will watch your page for a reply so a conversation can take place in one location. Thanks. --Moni3 (talk) 13:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)