User talk:CSTLewis

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 18:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CSTLewis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made no threat of legal action or threats of any kindCSTLewis (talk) 18:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes you did. Talk page access removed RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Forwarding material to somebody's legal department is a threat of legal action or otherwise intended to have a chilling effect on discussion. Thus, it is treated as a legal threat. —C.Fred (talk) 18:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a legal threat as defined by the courts, or any sensible person. You applying intent because of your feelings is also not a legal threat, or a valid reason. You're a moderator moderating with feelings, that is not ok. CSTLewis (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We're going by the Wikipedia definition, not the courts definition, and this message is a clear indication that you will target external legal process against that user. —C.Fred (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second this. No legal threats, as defined and agreed on by the English Wikipedia community at Wikipedia:No legal threats, full stop. Ed talk! 19:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And you now. This is all screen shot as my argument for damages. That is a formal legal action threat.

But hey, go on and leave the clear and reported libel up for all to read and continue screen capturing and reporting. Dumbass. CSTLewis (talk) 19:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right, an actual legal threat. I'm going to sue for records to start. An open source site locks editing to certain pages and only allows privilege to certain users who are allowed to publish slander. When questioned about this and informed that this has been reported to the injured party claimant was retaliated against.

CSTLewis (talk) 19:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let's also talk about the clear plagiarism of this wiki as well....... CSTLewis (talk) 19:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just got off with Project Veritas, everything is forwarded, this included. I am now reporting to the few that I can tell news organizations this page was plagiarized from. You gotta quote the entire page and give credit to amend this because it is direct copy and paste. CSTLewis (talk) 19:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed talk page access now as well. We are done here. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]