This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:Cahk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


False Edit[edit]

I have received a message claiming I have made an edit to a Martha clan page, however I have not made any edits at all. Please clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.55.250 (talk) 03:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

You are referring to this edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maratha_clan_system&diff=212817273&oldid=212817019). However, given this is a IP address edit, someone else who used this IP address in the past have made the edit for which I reverted. You do not need to worry about it, particularly it has been a number of years.--Cahk (talk) 01:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

File: Royal Heraldry Society of Canada[edit]

Hi,

i has written the article about Royal Heraldry Society of Canada in german language. Can you take the image/logo of the Society in the infobox in german article? Thanks!

Best Regards --Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 13:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

You can upload the image to the German version of the article. The image cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons because it is a fair use image, which would otherwise make the image available across all Wikipedia language sites.--Cahk (talk) 19:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CFSEU.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CFSEU.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

can I establish a link?[edit]

You have just deleted my link on Desiree, can I build a new independent link? Thanks.

User talk pages[edit]

Be very careful, this is misuse of rollback as it is an illegitimate edit. Users are welcome to remove warnings per WP:BLANKING and it is a breach of policy for others to restore those warnings. --FAT RAT (talk) 20:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Regarding MarkupChop article[edit]

Hi,

Please advise me which section you think as the promotional in this article MarkupChop to remove it for make this article available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celvakumar (talkcontribs) 09:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

You should leave a message with Jc86035 who tagged your article. My revert is strictly on the removal of the speedy removal tag.--Cahk (talk) 09:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
@Celvakumar: I tagged your article because, as the notice explains, you created a conflict of interest by writing an article about your own project (you put your own name in the "Founder" entry of the infobox); you removed the deletion notice that another editor added without actually resolving the problem; and you don't have any sources except the company website and blog (those are considered bad sources because they're too closely related to the subject of articles). Jc86035 (talkcontributions) Use {{ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 10:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

UAA[edit]

Hi, Cahk. Please limit your reports in WP:UAA. Thanks. Pikachu2568 (talk) 05:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) As a longtime contributor to UAA, I can vouch for the fact that admins won't take action on accounts with no edit history at all. If they seem related to a real business/organization/group, {{uw-username}} seems to be the most appropriate response.
If they have edited but only in the draft space and it's promotional, then {{uw-coi-username}} is the most effective.
But if they edit in the mainspace or userspace, UAA is fair game. --Drm310 (talk) 05:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

PLEASE, DO NOT STOP MY MISSION FOR FIX THE MIND-SET OF OUR NEXT-GENERATIONS![edit]

I EDIT THE ARTICLES THAT WRITE ABOUT RACISM AND HATENESS...

DOES NOT YOU KNOW HOW DANGEROUS THAT ARTICLES FOR THE MIND-SET OF OUR NEXT GENERATIONS???

DO YOU CAN LET OUR NEXT GENERATIONS HAVE ERROR MIND-SET???

I CAN NOT...

I SPEND MY IMPORTANT TIME FOR EDIT THESE ARTICLES...

BUT...

WHY YOU BLOCK ME???

WHY???

>,< — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCIENCE-ACTIVISTS (talkcontribs) 09:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

With respect to the message for myself and Amaury, you may wish to read: WP:FORUM, WP:NOTBLOG and WP:BALL.--Cahk (talk) 15:02, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Also to be clear, neither of us blocked you from editing. Wikipedia administrators did. --Cahk (talk) 15:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

hello[edit]

hi im just trying to add 2 links which is about guayusa like everyone else has done on the page.

which one is not allowed and why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.130.132.51 (talk) 06:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Neither are allowed - read WP:PROMOTION. Thank you for brining to my attention the links to various commercial websites, for which I have removed them.--Cahk (talk) 06:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

hi[edit]

ok well if you are going to take off my external link why dont you take off all of them because they all lead back to someone selling guayusa. plus under notes you have 3 website links linking back to products they are under notes.

they are

http://www.runa.org http://www.stashtea.com http://www.davidstea.com

I wanted to put my link up there because i sell guayusa also like the other links you have up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.130.132.51 (talk) 07:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you again. I did remove all of them just now.--Cahk (talk) 07:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
For the record, I do not read through the entire article. If I notice advertisement links, I will remove them. You can do that as well. --Cahk (talk) 07:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Nadine Roberts[edit]

I clearly see you dont want to know the truth this is not vandalism .trying to put the truth out there . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tilly Mary (talkcontribs) 07:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

The rollback was on the basis of failing to explain why the removal of content. Honesty in your mind is subjective. --Cahk (talk) 07:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

lee kuan yew[edit]

Hi Cahk, Sorry I'll leave a summary of what I've done next time on the edit page. I removed the materials because I felt that they should not be on the front page of the death of lee kuan yew page. I explained this on the talk page for that article. Discmon (talk) 05:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

OK. --Cahk (talk) 05:44, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

CSD tagging speed[edit]

Hey, I noticed you tagged Tom Fexas as A7, when, after a google search, it's seen that Fexas is a notable person in the yacht designing world. Tagging within a minute or two of article creation is something that should be avoided, as new article creators may not have had enough time to insert references and the like that counter a potential CSD tagging. I know it's easy enough to just click the Twinkle button (I was guilty of it as well), but you probably should wait a couple of minutes in the future before tagging. All the best, Buggie111 (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

The tagging speed issue was my fault[edit]

I have created a handful of pages which, once finished, worked out well. However I did not edit this page Tom Fexas in a sandbox first, I simply created the new page, added the first couple of sentences, and was going to continue editing from there. I had done that with past pages, but I see that you now have bots to instantly catch that sort of thing before the page can be completed. In the future I will edit the entire page before posting it, my apology. That will have the added benefit of being able to finish the page I started, rather than having someone else immediately take it over and block me out while they research the article I had already researched and was prepared to write. :-) But thanks for the help, much appreciated. Thanks, Tomstevenson (talk) 00:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Tom Stevenson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomstevenson (talkcontribs) 00:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't want to make it seem you were being left out (that template was towards anyone who wanted to re-tag it). Some people don't return to articles they created for a long time, which is why I didn't want to simply revert and leave it alone. Anyways, I've finished putting in the info from the URL's I've got, so (s)he's yours. Also, you will be getting credit for the WP:DYK nomination. Buggie111 (talk) 00:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the messages. I should have researched a bit more before tagging. My apologies.--Cahk (talk) 04:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

T-28[edit]

It wasn't a test. I just don't know how to place what I know about the T-28's involvement in the secret war in Laos. I was there everyday. I know what it was used for, who used it and some additional info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyler1995s (talkcontribs) 06:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability.--Cahk (talk) 07:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

I just wanted to say "hi" — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoTrack (talkcontribs) 13:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

A7[edit]

An assertion that someone is a professor at a University or has published books (except self-published books) is an indication of plausible significance, and passes A7. It doesn't necessarily mean actual notability, but John Metz Baer is a Fellow of the APA, which passes the notability standard WP:PROF. DGG ( talk ) 03:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion[edit]

OK I will remove content. and simple write name

You are not allowed to use Wikipedia to advertise yourself or your company. --Cahk (talk) 07:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Regarding your message[edit]

I did not edit anything, I think you got it wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.134.33.191 (talk) 10:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Commentary[edit]

Did you actual read what was removed. It was very very mean spirited political propaganda commentary which is actually libelous. It is my hope to keep page more accurate respectful and factual free of emotions and libelous gossip — Preceding unsigned comment added by Integritytruth (talkcontribs) 22:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Honest worked[edit]

Cahk the truth is going to come up in some point that mean I going to express myself the many times I want to so keep patrol the page's more often :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honest worked (talkcontribs) 00:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

MikeGarrod[edit]

Hi Cahk,

I tried to be neutral - but I guess that is not the case

Never mind, we can just leave it completely out of date - as I do not have time to keep changing it to get it correct — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeGarrod (talkcontribs) 09:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Reason for content removal[edit]

I removed the Chance 'scandal' on the Skeletonwitch page because neither he or Skeletonwitch have publically made a statement about it and as nobody really knows a lot of information and it could be twisted around very easily I believe they (And I, as a respectful fan) would much rather have it kept as lowkey as possible — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misscadaveroux (talkcontribs) 21:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

The information you removed are cited, and is public information. If you believe he's acquitted, or otherwise have the case been dispensed with, feel free to add the information. You should read WP:CENSOR.--Cahk (talk) 21:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Thankyou[edit]

Thank you for helping by deleting the page Inspurate. I tried to make it as neutral as possible but if you think it should be deleted than ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FahadUddin92 (talkcontribs) 15:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Cj harvey.[edit]

Hi. I changed the reason to A7 when deleting. You can't use A11 for people or solid things. It's for things that someone has made up, like a new word (used in one small class in a school in a place no-one has heard of), or a new drinking game (Vodka and blackcurrant Pong), or a new game (bearing a strong resemblance to cricket, but played with a rounders bat). Possibly real - but absolutely non-notable - not even up and coming. We assume good faith (cough cough) and call it A11 and bin it. Now people, we have A7 for real and non-notable, prod/AfD for fictional (i.e. published or mythical characters) and non-notable, and G3 hoax for ones that aren't real and aren't documented anywhere. Hoax also applies to made up solid things, because they are pure misinformation. While six people might be using the new word 'plurget' (what's left of last night's pizza), the island of Woggletopping (in the English Channel - only appears on the third Thursday of a month containing two full moons and if the weather is foggy) is definitely not in use by anyone - and so is a hoax. Peridon (talk) 21:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Apologies if you knew this already - I deal a lot with newcomers and am in the habit of explaining things... Peridon (talk) 21:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Article copyright[edit]

i have post an article about a person he have website and on website there is same article published because he is owner of that website. now what i do ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tipsclick (talkcontribs) 08:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

You are not allowed to use Wikipedia for promotional purposes. See WP:PROMOTION.--Cahk (talk) 08:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion U5[edit]

Hi, I noticed you have been tagging a number of user pages with CSD:U5. However, there is some reasonable leeway allowed for what people can include in the user pages, and I think you are being a little too zealous in the application of that speedy tag. For example, several of the pages you tagged were actually draft articles that had been submitted at WP:AFC and were very much not an abuse of U5, another looked like it was just the user saying a few things about himself. For some others, it really wasn't clear what the users wanted them for, so we shouldn't assume it's for nefarious reasons. Did you perhaps consider asking any of these users what they wanted those pages for before tagging them for deletion? On the whole, I'd advise only using the CSD:A5 tag for blatant abuse of user pages - especially when it comes to new users who may well be scared off, losing us potential long-term contributors. Squinge (talk) 11:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

I am mindful of the fact userpage can have some leeway. The one U5 I tagged, for which you reversed, appears to be an advertisement for an institution that teaches IT. Google Translate seem to indicate to me the user was promoting the institution's credentials, coupled with contact information and website. I would think that would fairly be seen as advertisement (maybe not CSD standard, but AfD at a minimum). --Cahk (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I actually reverted several of your taggings, but I can't remember what they were now (and my contributions list is quite long because was very busy yesterday and I can't really find them now). I've recently seen several people jumping on U5 deletions almost as soon as a new editor arrives, tagging their pages for just including a bit of information about themselves or because the pages contains something not obviously understandable. I think U5 should only be used for obvious misuse over some longer period, with new editors given time to see if they really are going to start contributing. Many start here by just playing with their user pages for a while to get the hang of things, and there's nothing at all wrong with that. Slapping them with U5 deletions very soon after they have joined, without even any offer to help on their talk page and guide them into using the site, seems very bitey to me and is not likely to help retain editors who mean well. Also, when it comes to draft articles for creation, at least they're going through the right process, and unless their creation is obviously so problematic that it needs immediate deletion I think it's better to leave their submission to be reviewed and hopefully give them some useful feedback on how to improve their attempts. (And use of user space for creating draft articles for creation is surely never an abuse of U5). Anyway, those are just my thoughts, offered after seeing quite a lot of newcomers getting various deletion notices and other slapdowns handed out, when what they really need is a helping hand or to be just left alone to feel their way around. Squinge (talk) 08:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification on U5. I see in total 3 were declined. With respect to your comment about being bitey - I look at WP:UPNOT, particularly "Excessive unrelated content" as guide. I suppose CSD is not always necessary.--Cahk (talk) 11:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, OK, fair enough - and thanks for considering my thoughts. Squinge (talk) 11:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Yellow umbrella, Cahk.

Unfortunately MrX has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unreviewing this so others can have a look.

To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.

Natpukarthi[edit]

SORRY FOR THE MISTAKE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natpukarthi (talkcontribs) 08:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Ya M Sverdlova SOE[edit]

Hi Cahk,

Could you please explain in a bit more detail how the subject page is in line with A7 Speedy Deletion criteria? From what I understand, a wiki page about one of Russia's biggest military industrial facilities may be of interest to readers. This is only a cover page so to speak and I will be making further reviews to it in the time ahead.

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by USSR Metals (talkcontribs) 10:17, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

An administrator review has determined the tag was not warranted. I tagged it as A7 because the article contained no references, nor any credible information about the organization in question.--Cahk (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Cahk, thank you for pointing that out. I will try and add a few non primary sources and expand the page to make it contain more credible information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USSR Metals (talkcontribs) 08:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Amjadhussen[edit]

I have considered poster printing as a topic and wanted to add some more info as well I thought some admin will call it a stub and give me a chance to make it more useful — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amjadhussen (talkcontribs) 11:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Because the topic already exists in Wikipedia, you may want to edit that section of the Poster article and expand as you see fit instead of creating a new page.--Cahk (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Moving an article from English wikipedia to French wikipedia[edit]

Hi Cahk,

I recently created an article, Fédération québécoise du canot et du kayak. I have written this article in French since it is more for francophones. I would like to move it to French Wikipedia, how can I do this? Is it best to delete it from English wikipedia and re-write it in French wikipedia?

Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emiliebissonfqck (talkcontribs) 17:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your article was speedy deleted from Wikipedia because it was used for advertising/promotion purpose. You may wish to recreate it on the French Wikipedia, but beware of what is allowed. See WP:PROMOTION. --Cahk (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

VATSIM[edit]

I'm not a Wikipedian, but noticed several persistent vandalism instances on the VATSIM page. I noticed that you have tried to address it, but the person is at it again. I don't know how to fix it or report it to others or lock the page. 67.250.93.70 (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

I have checked the log of the page, the level of vandalism has yet to reach the point where the page should be protected. The most recent vandalism-edits have been reverted, and the account blocked permanently. --Cahk (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

PLEASE CONSIDER ME[edit]

Good Day Sir,

I write in response to an article i wrote titled "Albanny Technologies" which A tag was placed on and later got deleted, citing section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, i wish to state here that Albanny Technologies has played a pivotal role in today's ICT Development in Nigeria, which has earned the Company's recognition by the Government of Nigeria. i also wish to admit my mistake that i didn't provide much information as regards why the subject is important or significant.in the light of this,i wish to humbly plead to retrieve the deleted material for further improvement and reference. and also which to tender my unreserved apology for that blunder i committed. i hope and believe that my appeal will be given fair hearing and kind considerations. thanks in Anticipation Mikebilz (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikebilz (talkcontribs) 19:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I tagged the article, but it was up to an administrator of Wikipedia to decide whether to delete the article. I honestly cannot recall what was on the article, as you can see from my edits that I tag multiple pages everyday. I do not have the power to revive the article after it has been deleted. I see you already left message with User:RHaworth, he may be of assistance to you.--Cahk (talk) 03:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

The user Shajee Ahmad[edit]

Is also a possible sock puppet, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj. Wgolf (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Applezap4[edit]

I'm sorry, I didn't know I wasn't supposed to be editing this site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Applezap4 (talkcontribs) 01:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sideguide[edit]

Hello Cahk. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sideguide, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:JeremiahBennett[edit]

Hello Cahk. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:JeremiahBennett, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I think this is an acceptable user page wthin the guidelines. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 17:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

I am surprised. The userpages I tagged this morning were all along the same line, but without the work email, personal email, phone number, etc on this user page, and they were all speedy deleted as U5.--Cahk (talk) 18:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
The difference I see here is that he expresses an intention to contribute to the encyclopedia, so he is not the usual U5 target, a Facebooker interested only in social-networking. U5 contains an exemption for "résumé-style pages" and what he says about himself is not irrelevant to possible contributions. I did remove the phone and email details, and explained why on his talk page. JohnCD (talk) 18:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
We'll just have to agree to disagree. His 'blog' is not functional, and therefore, the link to his website really is just to promote the company. Just to be clear, EVERY U5 I tagged this morning said they want to contribute, but clearly was functioning just as an advertisement/social network page.--Cahk (talk) 18:59, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Well, we disagree, and different admins are likely to have different thresholds; take this one to WP:MFD if you like, but I see nothing there that goes against WP:UPYES. The sort of thing I think U5 is directed against is the detailed Facebook-style life-history and list of schools, relatives, hobbies etc, often from a teenage Indian and illustrated with pictures like this of the subject gazing moodily through sunglasses.
By the way, you don't need to use Talkback any more, there is an easier way: if you start a message on your talk page with {{ping|<username>}}, then provided you sign with ~~~~ in the same edit, the WP:Notification system lights up a red marker on the target's screen to tell them that they have been mentioned. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, wrong link, I should have written WP:Notifications. JohnCD (talk) 22:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Bernardotobias[edit]

Hi. Just recently i wrote a couple of pages and was patrolled by you. Firts i wrote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernardolopestobias and then https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernardo_Lopes_Tobias and they do refer to the same person. Its my first wiki experience and i didnt know how to delete the first page. i'd like to delete it and keep the second one. Please help me out? Thanks! bernardo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernardotobias (talkcontribs) 08:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

@Bernardotobias: I have already tagged the first page for deletion (and has since been deleted). As for the second article you created: First, you removed the speedy removal tag which is not allowed if you were the author of the page. Second, I tagged the page for speedy deletion because the article has not shown the reader why this person is notable. I suggest you read WP:BAND. Also, the article have only 1 reliable source (personal blogs don't count). You should consider moving the page to your user space for the time being to improve in accordance to WP:BAND. --Cahk (talk) 09:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

San Diego Shipwreck[edit]

Good Day! I was only trying to familiarize myself in creating an article and did not know that it already made one like that. I am really sorry. Me and my group mates are going to make an article about the San Diego Shipwreck as it is a requirement for one of our subject. I am really sorry. I do not know what to do. I am not prepared yet for the things to be discussed in the page, so I am hoping if you can help me. That is, if the page is deleted can I still make one of the same title? Thank You! Absred (talk) 10:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

@Absred:: Hi Absred! I tagged the page as speedy delete because it had no content whatsoever, and would appear to me to be a test page. If you are interested in creating an article on that subject matter, I would suggest you to create a draft (see Wikipedia:Drafts) first. This lets everyone know your article is a work-in-progress, and is not necessarily just a test. Yes, you can create another article under the same title. Hope that helps.--Cahk (talk) 16:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rothesay.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rothesay.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086Talk 02:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of page "Varun glitz"[edit]

Hello sir,the page has right informations and good references.He is the latest trending musician among the school and college students,he is been searched continuously in google by so many fans of him,he has even given interview for South Indian channels like sun music and kalaingar TV.There are no articles about him on Wikipedia about his personal life and professional which everyone searches and doesn't gets it.so I consider that there must be a article about him.Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karthyraj (talkcontribs) 02:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

I suggest you read WP:BAND. I was not able to find any news article for the person you specified in the article, and any reference to him was self-published. Wikipedia is not an autobiography about the personal life of people, so if that's the only reason an article was created for him, it will very likely be speedy deleted.--Cahk (talk) 03:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Gaurav Negi Indian[edit]

Please wait for some time before tagging a page as CSD unless it comes under G3 or G10. I suggest you to wait at least 10 mins before tagging a page as A1 and A3 because most of these editors are new and wont be knowing of the policies of wikipedia. Thank You. Lakun.patra (talk) 07:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

User:Foysalkabirsoikat[edit]

Hi there, I noticed you were requesting a block for User:Foysalkabirsoikat. I've opened a sockpuppet investigation here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soikat1996 and I'd certainly welcome your input. Thanks! --Non-Dropframe talk 06:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hoax?[edit]

On what basis do you claim that Thamarasseril Illam is a hoax? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

@WikiDan61: The term seems to actually refer to a particular location, not a particular family. The article has no reference basis, nor I can find anything on the internet besides its usage as a location.--Cahk (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 04:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion and retrieving the material (RePack)[edit]

Hi there Cahk!

An article I created (RePack) was deleted by you. Perhaps according to A7?

It's been a few weeks but is it possible to retrieve the deleted material? This way I could, possibly, edit it to meet the criteria? Any tips on making a piece about an environmentally and commercially important concept suitable are appreciated. My goal is not to promote, but to create neutral entries about Scandinavian startup companies.

Many thanks in advance.

jshore7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jshore7 (talkcontribs) 10:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@Jshore7: I nominated the article, but it was deleted by an administrator. I don't recall what the article is about, and in any event, no power to undelete the article. You may wish to use Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard for any inquires. --Cahk (talk) 15:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)