User talk:Caponica

Sockpuppetry

There is evidence that you may be Lanternix. I have opened a sockpuppet investigation [1], you may defend yourself. -Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 00:43, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Caponica! Thank you very much for contributing to Wikipedia. I am sorry for the behavior of that user Falastine fee Qalby. He has been damaging articles about Copts lately and apparently he thinks that he will scare people off by making up stories of them being sockpuppets. Please please do NOT stop editing on Wikipedia because of him. I am sure an IP investigation will be made at some point, and they will realize that we are not the same user. Also, there is a rule on Wikipedia whereby anyone who reverts esits more than 3 times within 24 hours will be blocked. That user Falastine fee Qalby has done it many times. Please let me know if you see him do it again, and I will report him. Thanks again and please let me know if you have any questions. Welcome to Wiki and God bless :) --Lanternix (talk) 09:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

This account has been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of Lanterix. It is too much to believe that this editing pattern combined with the anon IP edits and other associated socks are the natural edits of a new user.--BozMo talk 10:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Caponica is clearly NOT a sockpuppet of Lanternix, as proven here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lanternix/Archive. It's about time you unblock him/her and apologize. --Lanternix (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, as far as I can see Caponica was shown to be a sock of a multiple sock user. However, it was not proven that the multiple sock user was linked to Lanternix. --BozMo talk 20:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything in the report that says that Caponica is a sockpuppet of multiple users. Where on the page does it say that? --Lanternix (talk) 23:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come back

Hello caponica! I know you got blocked unfairly. This happens on Wikipedia! Unfortunately it's not a perfect place. I am writing to ask you not to be discouraged, and to encourage you to register with a different account and come back. Wikipedia needs people like you. Meanwhile, I promise to do my best to restore your contributions until you come back. I am sorry you got caught in the middle of this. TRUTH will eventually prevail. Cheers! --Lanternix (talk) 05:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock and apology

Dear Caponica,

Your account has been unblocked and I apologize for the block which was in error. I am not sure if you have tried to edit whilst the block was in place. Apparently you joined Wikipedia by entering into the middle of a content dispute (in which sock puppets were in use) and reverting disputed content to previous versions, which is why you were also mistaken for a "sock puppet". Welcome to Wikipedia and I hope that you will enjoy contributing your own fresh material to improve articles as time goes on.

--BozMo talk 05:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Welcome back Caponica, and my apologies once again about what happened. I hope you will enjoy contributing to Wiki :) All the best, and please let me know if you have any questions or if you need any assistance. --Lanternix (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]