Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
In particular, thank you for your contributions to Reid Stowe, though, I trust, your interests will shortly branch out to other articles, and your contributions to them will be well received.
Hopefully the quotes and references you removed from this article were not vandalism, they have been restored because I believe balance in the article is important. Aloha27 (talk) 12:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't even hint at the idea: Catdream was clearly performing a good-faith edit: he/she stated motivations clearly in the edit summaries, and made reference to talk page discussion as a motivation for the edit. That absolutely, and unambiguously takes the edit far from the realm of vandalism. See remarks in the opening paragraph of Wikipedia:Vandalism: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." You may find his or her edits disagreeable, misguided, or ill-considered; that's another matter entirely. In that regard, I happen to disagree with you, and think that it is best that all parties join the discussion on the talk page. Take care. Gosgood (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
