User talk:Ccc09

Please add new comments at the end of this page - I've moved the help request down there. Chzz ► 14:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ccc09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cees van Riel, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Nuujinn (talk) 12:26, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cees van Riel

{{helpme}} What is most import to change to this article and how? Ccc09 (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asking about Cees van Riel?--SPhilbrick T 13:40, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I need help for the page about Cees van Riel., thanks!Ccc09 (talk) 13:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just entered a meeting expected to last an hour or so. If someone else helps great, if not, I'll comment in a little over an hour.--SPhilbrick T 14:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't put external links, such as http://www.eur.nl/ and corporatecommunication, in the article itself; they can only be used in a special section at the end for == External links == - and then, only subject to certain conditions; see WP:EL
All facts need a reference to a reliable source - such as the stated date-of-birth.
It is especially important to have good, independent reliable sources (e.g. newspaper, book) for any claims, such as, "This was the first programme of its kind, offered at a university level (Master Degree), in the world."

Any information that cannot be supported by an appropriate reliable source should be removed

Some of the language is vague - for example "a variety of companies" - state facts; be precise. How many, what companies, and where is a reference. Other wording is not neutral e.g. "an influential Dutch scientist"^{[according to whom?]}
The section 'EcQ - The Strategic Alignment Monitor was copied from a website - here - so, I had to remove it.

Do not copy text from other websites. Doing so is a copyright violation.

If you did write it yourself, see WP:DCM.

Please shorten the section on "Books and articles" - we do not need an exhaustive list; a short paragraph of prose, mentioning examples, would be much better. Wikipedia is not a directory.
The article is mostly based on references from "Rotterdam School of Management", and could do with more independent reliable sources, to help show why the person is "notable".

Chzz ► 14:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chzz gave a lot of detailed advice, I'll comment from a slightly different perspective. I see two interrelated issues:

It reads like a CV
It has no independent sources

Independent sources are the lifeblood of Notability, but they are more than that. If you use multiple sources independent of the subject, you are more naturally going to have a NPOV style (not guaranteed, but more likely). By using only sources from the source, it is going to read more like a CV, more like an advertisement for the person instead of a neutral biography.--SPhilbrick T 15:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks both! I will have a try.Ccc09 (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]