User talk:Ccdesan

An anonymous user recently commented on a Votes for Deletion page (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/By The Saints), signing with your username. If this was really you, please log in and take credit. Thank you. — Gwalla | Talk 18:38, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Ccdesan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mgm|^(talk) 19:16, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wally Boag

Once again welcome and thanks for expanding the article on Wally Boag. I think expanding existing articles is very important because a long articles is usually much more helpful than a tiny stub, so your work is much appreciated! Here's a few hints on Wikipedia's house style (see WP:MOS) and a few rules that are relevant to the work you've done so far.

Please tag the images with image copyright tags and provide detailed information on where you got it and if it's tagged as {{fairuse}}, please provide a reasoning as to why the image in question is essential for the article and why there's no free alternatives. This is essential. Images without this information will be deleted, because Wikipedia strives to adhere to copyright law. (see Wikipedia:Uploading images for more info).
You appear to have used the Disney Legends page as a source. In general, pages you've used to get information to write the article need to be in a == references == section along with any books you've used as well.
The subject of the article needs to be bolded in the lead section of an article.
And finally, don't be afraid to create more internal links.

I'll make some edits to the article to show what I mean. I hope you'll stick around. - Mgm|^(talk) 19:16, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} May 21, 2008 Editing the article "Pibgorn (Webcomic)", I added the titles of the 8 story arcs and a link to an external Pibgorn tribute page, but every time I link to the article from an external site, the previous iteration (sans story arcs) shows up. I can only see the latest version by going to the History page and clicking "article" again. And I've thoroughly flushed all my caches. Is something flaky with the article?

What do you mean "every time I link to the article from an external site"? Also, remember to sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~) please! :) Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 05:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For example, if I'm out at a random page on the web, go to the Wikipedia home page, and search for "Pibgorn (Webcomic)", I will see the old iteration until I click on the "article" tab once again. Once I've done that, I can poke around inside Wikipedia and always come back to the latest version. If I leave Wikipedia again and come back in through the main gate, it's the penultimate version that I see. That's why it seems very odd. Thanks for answering... ccdesan (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:WallyBoagWithBalloons.jpg

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:WallyBoagPecosBill.jpg

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ccdesan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ccdesan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pacific Pioneer Broadcasters

The article Pacific Pioneer Broadcasters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG. Local social group, no significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]