User talk:Celibat
Nomination of The white prisoner for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The white prisoner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The white prisoner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 23:45, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
using talk pages
[edit]...much better to place comments at the bottom of somebody's talk page: if in doubt click the new section link at the top. (I've moved it to the bottom) In any case, the place for your post is the discussion page for the deletion of this article. Since I don't read Bulgarian, I can't comment on the links you've given, but the point of the deletion proposal is not that the topic is not worth an article: it's that this particular book is not. It is getting media attention because what it is writing about is newsworthy, not because it is remarkable in it's own right. The article also runs the risk of leading to the creation of two articles which may drastically disagree with eachother: this is what POV fork means. The content would be much better added to the biography of the book's subject matter.TheLongTone (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- btw have cut & pasted your post onto the deletion discussion pageTheLongTone (talk) 20:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)