User talk:Cerberus0

Note

I do not often check this page. Email is preferred.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ballantine rings

Please stop your disruptive removal of "Ballantine rings" from the Borromean rings article. Your dislike of content that connects to commercial topics is noted, but irrelevant. Highly-reliable sources state that this has been used as one of the standard names of this topic. As such, it is worthy of mention in the lead and content of the article, and not for removal to leftover-topic trivia sections. In general, we mention commonly used alternative names in leads, and I see no reason for an exception in this case. Your dislike of commerce is not a valid reason for this removal. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you look at the ngram I provide, which disproves your claim? Cerberus (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Claims such as that a certain phrase was used to name a certain topic need published reliable sources. Google ngrams is not a published reliable source and relying on it instead of what the sources actually say is original research. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In what sense is Google ngrams not a "published reliable source? Is that a policy?

Here is the persistent URL for the comparison.

And regardless of the fact that the literature contains a minor reference to this truly negligible usage, that does not justify 5 (!) mentions in a short article. Can we at least agree on that? Cerberus (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am still awaiting a response. Cerberus (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]