User talk:Chairboy/Wikipedia:Treeism

I don't see why consumption of puppies should affect a candidate's chances of adminship. At best this is discrimination against administrators from many cultures – Gurch 01:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The whole thing is a joke, Chairboy (people oppose one another for something, nothing and everything in between). Losing sight of that probably is a road to hell. Anyway, I'm betting that if I ever go up for admin, you'll take the opportunity to settle a score, regardless whether I'm trustworthy. That's kind of what people do and they'll keep doing it until we stop having beauty contests. Grace Note 04:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, just noticed this. I think it's brave the way you don't let things like the assumption of good faith get in the way of a good ad-hominem argument. Most folks would feel constrained by standards of civility and facts, but you've charged your way right past that to making an unsupported statement attacking my character, bravo. If you ran for adminship, I'm confident that the quality of your interactions on Wiki would be clearly established during the discussion, and I wish you the best of luck. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]