User talk:Chazwazla

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Chazwazla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! You might like to have a read of what I've posted at Talk:George Brandis, which explains why I revertd your insertion. It is not an objection to the subject matter, but in a biography of a living person, there will need to be stronger, and independent, sourcing of the material. If you can locate such material, then a version of the text could potentially be included. Regards, hamiltonstone (talk) 12:44, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

How about i just go for an smaller entry to start with -

 In early 2013 Brandis was prominent in the media for his views on free speech and media regulation.

I can give 9 references to articles and video relating to Brandis' views on free speech and media regulation.

Chazwazla (talk) 00:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Something based on those sources may work, though I think the sentence should be more specific about what those views are / were. Why don't you post a proposal on the article talk page, with some references listed, and I or other editors could check it out and help work it into the article? Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 00:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
What you just added is better, that's great, but the last part cannot only be cited to Brandis, because it refers to his outspokenness, which others must assess. See also my note at the article talk page. I will leave it as is for now, but do you have any references for that last phrase? Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 04:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Brandis again[edit]

Can you engage in the discussion here? I still don't think the quote is appropriate, and I've set out the reasons in more detail. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)