User talk:Chiderahanaebue/Club for Growth

Proposed Edits

Club for growth, an independent group that is similar to being fiscally conservative. For certain people, especially political science students, it is important to make these sorts of distinctions between ideas even if they're part of the same ideology. I am curious though, I don't think you're able to use their website as a source, do you have others in mind? Love they way you're thinking about the small pieces of this article! Yulia

Tuk28507 (talk) 20:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like how you pointed out the distinctions between ideas, what distinctions? or could you be more specific? Chiderahanaebue (talk) 19:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2022 is gone, when they gave up. https://ballotpedia.org/Club_for_Growth_Action_(Super_PAC) these are scorecards from 2016 on ward that shows the people that received over 90 percent (less and more). Given that Club for growth is all about no one paying taxes, etc. there is still a gap within the years of their documents that proves this. I will add examples from the scorecards cited which holds those in the organization accountable for what is happening each year moving on and what has happened in previous years. Libertarianism is what they're all about. 2016 Most of the republicans were apart of the Club for Growth expenditure excepts for one person who was a democrat. Chiderahanaebue (talk) 10:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply] 50.232.137.26 (talk) 00:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LEAD

Quote/ says on website a national page and network for growth for "economic freedom" all libertarian ideas and phenomenons, however they have different approaches to the way in which they want to fundraise in comparison to other groups.

Original website: https://www.clubforgrowth.org/

Club for Growth a conservative group in which has

{insert their benefits here}

ARTICLE BODY

PRIOR INFORMATION

Have some community goals but the others are mainly for libertarian concerns and expectations

tax cuts and economic policy issues is something that I am interested in learning more about. In general, as well as in this article. The club for Growth endorsed and raises money who meet its standard for what ever fiscal conservatism means.

(create bibliography)

This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution. If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live.

If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here.

Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content.

Bibliography sandbox FROM CLUB FOR GROWTH <copyright violation removed> == Article Draft == — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiderahanaebue (talk • contribs) 19:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What Club for Growth advocated for from 2016 till now

2022 is gone, when they gave up. https://ballotpedia.org/Club_for_Growth_Action_(Super_PAC) these are scorecards from 2016 on ward that shows the people that received over 90 percent (less and more). Given that Club for growth is all about no one paying taxes, etc. there is still a gap within the years of their documents that proves this. I will add examples from the scorecards cited which holds those in the organization accountable for what is happening each year moving on and what has happened in previous years. Libertarianism is what they're all about. 2016 Most of the republicans were apart of the Club for Growth expenditure excepts for one person who was a democrat. Chiderahanaebue (talk) 10:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]