User talk:ChrisWright79

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChrisWright79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sigh -- Ok -- I apologize. No more trolling from me -- I promise. I beg you to unblock me, but I shall submit to being blocked indefinitely should the need later arise -- oui?

Decline reason:

Accounts used to evade blocks will not be unblocked. Please use the unblock-en-l mailing list to discuss having your original account unblocked. -- Shell ^babelfish 06:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

ChrisWright79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.70.200.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Lordofring". The reason given for Lordofring's block is: "Account used for the sole purpose of vandalism".

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: Continued block evasion. Blocked indef. Please make use of the unblock-en-l mailing list to build a case for unblocking, if you feel this is unjust. Luna Santin 23:57, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]