- Archive 1 (November 2006 — July 2007)
- Archive 2 (July 2007 — September 2007)
- Archive 3 (September 2007 — November 2007)
- Archive 4 (November 2007 — October 2008)
- Archive 5 (October 2008 — August 2009)
- Archive 6 (August 2009 — March 2010)
- 1 Re: absurd rationales
- 2 Help!
- 3 Re: Larios family
- 4 Exact source for portrait of Sir John Cradock?
- 5 Happy Gibraltar Day
- 6 RFC
- 7 MV New Flame
- 8 Royal mint coining press a constable 1818
- 9 Merry Christmas
- 10 Possibly unfree File:HeartInHand.gif
- 11 Nomination for deletion of Template:Non-free use rationale historic
- 12 Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox mint
- 13 Gibraltar International Bank
- 14 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 15 Orphaned non-free image File:Ballymena coa.JPG
- 16 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Re: absurd rationales
Hi RedCoat10, believe me if I tell you that I had the slightest intention to remove such old issues. However, Justin tried to prove that I complained when the "Spanish POV" was removed, mentioning that issue (blame on him, if you want). It happen that it was the British POV the one that was removed in the Gibraltar article with an absurd rationale (mentioning a consensus in the lead paragraph for removing sourced information from another part of the article can be described as absurd, can't it be?). On the other hand, I do believe that your removal of the same information in Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006 (why is there so reluctance to show the position of the UK Government on the independence of Gibraltar? I don't know) was equally absurd. Why? Because as you possibly know and the article details, the Gibraltar Constitution Order (what the article is about) is a set of documents including the dispatch, the Order in Council and the annexes, where the actual text of the Constitution is included. Considering that the article deals with the Constitution Order and that the information about the UK Gov stance on Gibraltar independence is included in the dispatch (part of the Constitution Order), I cannot see a better description for your removal. Sorry, but that's what I think. On the other hand, don't worry, I'll clarify my statement in order to make it clear that I was referring to the diff provided by Justin (wait, the section was devoted to refuting Justin's comments... anyway, I'll make it clear). On the other hand, I don't understand your mention to my "list". I don't know what list you're referring to, but in the same way that I haven't included you in any "positive" list, I haven't done it in any "negative" one, so I don't really understand your over-reaction.
To conclude, it was Justin the one who exhumed so old issues, but now that I see you're concerned about something I said, I call your attention on this defamatory edition by you. May I ask equally for a rectification? It's interesting to note that you feel so susceptible with regard to a statement that was not referred to you, but to Gibnews (that was the edition I was referring to), while at the same time you have no problem in defaming in absence to anyone that is not involved in that issue (I'm referring to your statements on the "numerous occasions" I've been warned for personal attacks —can you mention one coming from uninvolved people?— or the most ludicrous one referred to the "well-known .. use [of my] prerogative as an administrator on the Spanish Wikipedia to systematically revert edits" —I mean, I don't need any admin prerogative to revert editions, as Justin or Gibnews does need any one to systematically revert my editions). Could I count on your rectification? Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 22:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi RedCoat, I'd like to wipe all that what's been going on last years and friendly ask for your help. As you know, Gibmetal is currently off and I haven't received any news from him in days (he's possibly at hospital). As you know, my English should be enhanced so I'd like to ask your help (even if I know you're not very much active). I'm currently working in User:Ecemaml/Nursery/John Mackintosh Square and User:Ecemaml/Nursery/List of Gibraltar placenames. If you wish, and have time, I'd like you to review such articles and fix and enhance whatever you find it's not properly expressed in English. Any help would be welcome. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 06:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Many thanks!!! I have some minor questions but they must wait for tomorrow. Family crisis :-( --Ecemaml (talk) 21:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: Larios family
You're welcome to but in any time, it's good to see you're still around! Thanks for sharing that information - I would have liked to have attended the last two museum lectures but unfortunately I was in hospital. Will you be attending the next one on 11 May on "The Way We Wear; Cloth, Clothes and the Red Cloak"? I'm hoping to attend this time.
Exact source for portrait of Sir John Cradock?
Redcoat10, Thank you so much for posting the portrait of Sir John Cradock. I just found it, and I have been looking for his likeness since I was a graduate student nearly 40 years ago, writing on Cradock. Can you tell me the exact source of the engraving of Thomas Lawrence's portrait of Cradock? For example, was it in a book? Do you know if the painting is still extant? Thank you for your work. Bluehistorian (talk) 20:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Bluehistorian
Happy Gibraltar Day
- Are you editing again? Some sanity would be welcomed. Wee Curry Monster talk 21:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Good to see you're still around! I might be able to get back to full-time editing in a couple of weeks; in the meantime you might see me sporadically. Hope you're doing well, RedCoat10 (talk) 12:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Gibraltar#RfC: Due weight & NPOV in the History section I have started an RFC to gather outside opinion related to this issue. Thought you may have an interest in commenting. Thanks. Wee Curry Monster talk 20:42, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
MV New Flame
An article that you have been involved in editing, MV New Flame has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.
Royal mint coining press a constable 1818
Hi I have the original copper printing plate and many others from the same edition trouble is I dont know which book they came from in 1818. Can you help email@example.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 15:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:HeartInHand.gif
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HeartInHand.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Template:Non-free use rationale historic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Template:Infobox mint has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Seconded - good to see you around. email 00:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ballymena coa.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Ballymena coa.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).