User talk:ChromaticaCali

Hey! New to Wikipedia, thought I'd fight the good fight and contribute. :)

August 2021

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Grace Randolph. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Accusing other editors of "trolling" is considered a personal attack on Wikipedia. Additionally, you have removed properly sourced material with the questionable claim it was "gossip" and the entirely false claim of "no real sources". Your only edits to Wikipedia thus far have been to remove negative information from this page; please open a talkpage discussion to support your editing and to explain why other editors (three now, including me) do not represent a consensus. Grandpallama (talk) 23:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Grace Randolph shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Grandpallama (talk) 23:44, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Grace Randolph. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. If you continue to edit this article disruptively, and if you persist in personal attacks against other editors, I will seek sanctions against you. You've been warned about this multiple times. Grandpallama (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am SHOCKED Grandpallama you put the Pajiba article back after the arguments I made on Randolph's talk page. That is SLANDER as there is no credit to that article, which ITSELF says it can't find any evidence of bad behavior on Randolph's part and points to no actual evidence of the accusations against Randolph. ChromaticaCali (talk) 19:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Randolph

If you have concerns about the neutrality of Grace Randolph, please raise the issue at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Other editors seem to disagree with you, and edit warring isn't going to resolve the issue, especially when editors are saying that your edits are non-neutral. Also, please be aware that there's discretionary sanctions on biographies of living people:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I did submit this to the board you suggested. ChromaticaCali (talk) 13:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]