User talk:Ckatz: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:32, 10 February 2009

You are not allowed in this website. Get the fuck out right now. {{#if:true|Ckatz^chat_spy Passsssssss (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You are not allowed in this website. Get the fuck out right now. {{#if:true|'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Paniccie|<font color="black">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' [[User:Passsssssss|Passsssssss]] ([[User talk:Passsssssss|talk]]) 15:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
-{{User:Ckatz/Talknote}}
-{| class="infobox" width="150"
-|- align="center"
-| [[Image:Vista-file-manager.png|50px|Archive]]
-'''[[Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page|Archives]]'''
-----
-|- align="center"
-| [[/Archive 1|Page One]]<br>[[/Archive 2|Page Two]]<br>[[/Archive 3|Page Three]]<br>[[/Archive 4|Page Four]]<br>[[/Archive 5|Page Five]]<br>[[/Archive 6|Page Six]]
-|}
-<br>
-<br>
-{{User:MiszaBot/config
-|archiveheader = {{talkarchive}}{{archive-nav}}
-|maxarchivesize = 200K
-|counter = 6
-|minthreadsleft = 0
-|minthreadstoarchive = 1
-|algo = old(21d)
-|archive = User talk:Ckatz/Archive %(counter)d
-}}
-<br/>
-<br/>
-{{User:Ckatz/FAQ}}
-{{TOChidden}}
-== Brand New Heavies Interview 2009 ==
-Hi Ckatz
-Would you please review this recent interview with The Brand New Heavies, and see if it is worthy to go up on their entry
-http://www.zani.co.uk/interviews.aspx?id=66
-Kind regards
-Matteo
-== Please reconsider your removal of GreenSetters,com ==
-Hello Ckatz,
-Can you please reconsider the removal of GreenSetters from the corporate socail responsibility and sustainable business pages? Perhaps if you looked at the page that I linked to you would see that this non-commercial resource provides over 200 resources focused on and closely related to csr and sustainable business. I realize that the site may not meet the external links guidelines, but if it does not then I would argue that several of the commercial sites that are linked from the page do not either. In any event, I realize that you make the call and I respect that, but perhaps you could review the link and reconsider. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, William Kelly wkelly@greensetters.com
---[[User:Wikelly1|Wikelly1]] ([[User talk:Wikelly1|talk]]) 22:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
-== [[User talk:BicMacDad18]] ==
-This editor, blocked as a sock of {{user|EverybodyHatesChris}}, is currently requesting an unblock, and appears to want your particular attention. Would you mind dropping by? [[User:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Glass</font>]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Cobra</font>]]''' 07:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
-== Long edit summaries gadget ==
-Why did you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki%3AGadgets-definition&diff=265656267&oldid=265655504 move] the long edit summaries gadget to the "user interface" section? It doesn't really change the user interface. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 22:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
-:It's really more of an interface tweak than an editing tool; the "editing" gadgets are special-purpose tools such as Twinkle and WikEd that offer a lot of features. Not a big deal, of course, but it seems a better fit where it is now. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 00:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
-== Revert of E-book art. ==
-I don't get why you removed the update (Bookboon.com) to external links on the "E-book" page? It was clearly referring to a wiki article, and as such not in void of any policies. Unless of course you have good reason to doubt the notability? In which case I would encourage you to look at the site first.
-If you have the time, please look in the matter and get back to me.
-Best regards
-N.j.hansen
-== RE: Canadian broadcasters / Super Bowl ==
-You have still not cited anywhere in the Wikipedia policies where it says that US networks cannot or should not be listed in "International distribution" under 'Canada'. NBC may not broadcast from '''within Canada''', but it certainly broadcasts ''into Canada'', throughout the entire country. As myself and many other Canadians do not have access to [[Citytv]], it would be useful to know that NBC, for instance, carries Chuck within Canada.
-As for your Super Bowl edit, you offer no reason for the removal of the information about the controversy of the Canadian simsubbing practices during that event. There are several sources I could cite that would provide evidence of a controversy, meriting mention of the issue in the article. Perhaps the paragraph can be retooled to clearly indicate that there is a controversy surrounding the simsub issue. I understand that you are an administrator and I respect that, but I also respectfully disagree with your edits in these cases. &mdash; [[user:CrazyInSane|<sup>`</sup>''C''<small>RAZY</small>`(<small>lN</small>)`''S''<small>ANE</small><sup>`</sup>]] 04:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
-== Daily Mail/John Cleese ==
-The claim that the [[Daily Mail]] is not a [[WP:RS]] is a sweeping statement. It is not prone to the wilder flights of fancy found in some UK tabloid newspapers, although it is hard to give an exact age for Ms Orr. The Mail says "Records obtained in the US suggest that she has knocked an impressive 18 years off her age and is in fact 45" but does not go into details . The problem here is not the Mail itself, but the way the information was presented in the Wikipedia [[John Cleese]] article.--'''''[[User:ianmacm|<span style="background:#88b;color:#cff;font-variant:small-caps">♦Ian<span style="background:#99c">Ma<span style="background:#aad">c</span></span>M♦</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ianmacm|(talk to me)]]</sup>''''' 19:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
-:Thanks for the feedback. From what I could determine in past discussions about the ''Mail'', it is considered to be semi-reliable - not "tabloidish", but also not entirely trustworthy when it comes to tabloid-style details about personal details. Given the vagueness of the text, it seems best not to use the information without a second source to verify. Thoughts? --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 19:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
-::As with the [[Fox News Channel]], the [[Daily Mail]] has some strong critics. However, it is not prone to stories like the all-time classic "[[Freddie Starr]] ate my hamster", which appeared in [[The Sun]] in 1986. The news story about John Cleese in the Mail at [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1127085/John-Cleese-blonde-lover-truth-claim-27.html] does not come across as deliberately false or sensational, and the Mail is careful to qualify the statement that Ms Orr is actually 45. I agree that this should not be in the [[John Cleese]] article without more confirmation, but do not think that the Mail has acted in bad faith over this issue. As a professional newspaper, it would have considered the possibility of a libel action if the information was blatantly false.--'''''[[User:ianmacm|<span style="background:#88b;color:#cff;font-variant:small-caps">♦Ian<span style="background:#99c">Ma<span style="background:#aad">c</span></span>M♦</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ianmacm|(talk to me)]]</sup>''''' 19:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
-== Re: Localize comments2 ==
-I usually respond on other talk pages but since the thread you responded to involves more than one person, I'll keep the discussion only on my talk page. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02b">Gary&nbsp;<b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 22:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
-: Also, please put [[Wikipedia talk:Comments in Local Time]] on your watchlist; I will be forming discussions there related to the script. I've already posted a question there and would appreciate input. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02b">Gary&nbsp;<b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 20:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-== Editing Print culture ==
- Dear Ckatz,
-The Information that I'm trying to add in this topic is not Original research but sourced from actual articles and news-reports. I keep trying too add references but you keep deleting my additions. So much for Wikipedia being a free Encyclopedia. I guess you guys have an agenda of your own as in you want to certain topics to reflect the views of the Wiki foundation.
-Cheers!
-Rags015  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rags015|Rags015]] ([[User talk:Rags015|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rags015|contribs]]) 05:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-== Paddleboarding ==
-Hi,
-I'm new to this and am wondering why you have removed my addition of Ponce Inlet as a Notable Paddleboarding Spot. This is an East Coast sport as well as the other locations listed and if you look at the East Coast Archive that we built as the original paddleboards.com (that became paddleboard.com) you will see the Ponce Inlet connection. It is also the location of the Annual East Coast Paddleboard Championships. We are looking to make more additions to this page and hope that they will be accepted. Florida has a strong paddleboarding community and several notable races that we would like to add. Can you explain your removal of this information? Your help would be greatly appreciated. [[User:Paddleboards|Paddleboards]] ([[User talk:Paddleboards|talk]]) 04:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)paddleboards
-== Kiwibox ==
-Trust me, I went to the link. Its legit. Plus I believe that is some important info. "Bad Girl" didn't pop out of thin air! [[User:IHelpWhenICan|IHelpWhenICan]] ([[User talk:IHelpWhenICan|talk]]) 23:21, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
-== Srebrenica massacre → Srebrenica genocide ==
-Hi. There has been some discussion on Talk:WP:RM about renaming the three sections on [[WP:RM]], but the normal interpretation of the middle section is "moved here either because the request is incomplete or it had been in the uncontested section and I contest the move (or think that a reasonable person may contest it)", never, "moved here because it should be speedy closed", which appears to be what you have done. In other words everyone deserves their day in court, and if they want to propose a move, let the community vote on it, or just speedy close it. In this case my opinion would be that a move that was discussed a year or two ago can legitimately be brought up for discussion, particularly, for example if something has changed. Please note, that ''all'' of the proposed moves in the "Other" section are potentially "contested" - that is why they are there, and not in the "Uncontroversial" section. My suggestion is to move it back to "Other", and then politely speedy close it if that is warranted. In fact I will be happy to speedy close it on Monday if it shows no support. Cheers. [[Special:Contributions/199.125.109.126|199.125.109.126]] ([[User talk:199.125.109.126|talk]]) 15:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
-NB - already moved back to other[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequested_moves&diff=267593146&oldid=267592722] by another admin. [[Special:Contributions/199.125.109.126|199.125.109.126]] ([[User talk:199.125.109.126|talk]]) 15:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
-== Cactions ==
-Sorry for another gadget-related message, but could you please follow up on [[Wikipedia:Gadget/proposals#Caction tool]]? Not sure whether that could be deemed "consensus"... but I leave it at your discretion. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Haza-w|'''haz''']]</font> <font size="1">([[User_talk:Haza-w|talk]])</font> 15:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
-== Edit to your monobook.js ==
-Hi, I just edited your monobook.js page, to add commented nowiki tags so that the page wouldn't show up in [[:Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates]]. If there's any problem with this, please let me know. <nowiki>{</nowiki>{[[User:Nihiltres|<span style="color:#233D7A;">Nihiltres</span>]]<nowiki>|</nowiki><span class="plainlinks">[[User talk:Nihiltres|talk]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?user=Nihiltres log]</span>}<nowiki>}</nowiki> 22:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
-== Safety Glass poster ==
-I am removing the poster from Wikipedia, because WE created it and it cannot be legally distributed or posted. We have never legally released it, and it was obtained and being used without our permission. Please feel free to contact me to discuss this urgent matter. Jhod Cardinal, Distribution Manager, Insight Film Studios 604.623.3369 ext 209  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.77.66.130|76.77.66.130]] ([[User talk:76.77.66.130|talk]]) 23:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-What is your business with the project Safety Glass? The poster on the wikipedia site is an uncleared sales tool designed for internal company use only; It was a test page not cleared for distribution. We are doing our best to get it off the internet. Insight Film Studios  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.77.66.130|76.77.66.130]] ([[User talk:76.77.66.130|talk]]) 01:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:Thank you for your note. Please keep in mind that the edits to remove the image were done without any proper explanation, which can often indicate vandalism. For future reference, it is very helpful if you provide a detailed edit summary when removing material from an article.In the case of a copyright issue, it is better still to add a note on the article's talk page so that other editors are aware of the problem. Otherwise, we have no way of knowing what your intentions are, or if you are even in a position to make such a judgement. (The comment ''"Poster is not approved by producers"'' by [[User:Grensel]], who I assume in also connected to your company, does not provide any way of verifying who "Grensel" is.)
-:As it turns out, your IP address (76.77.66.130) resolves back to Insight, so I'll take that as proof that you are connected to the company. The image in question - [[:File:Safety Glass 2009.jpg]] - was uploaded on or around January 18th by [[User:Torigo]], who listed the source as the website <nowiki>kinopoisk.ru</nowiki>. If it is not publicly available, it would probably fail our requirements for "fair use" and can thus be removed from the site if you wish. Please let me know and I will look into this matter further. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 01:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
-::I made a reply on my talk page, sorry for fracturing the conversation. The image was easily available with just a quick search, so I added an [[fair use|FUR]] to the image page and re-added the image to the article. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 02:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
-== Changes Reverted for Jack FM ==
-Why were my changes to [[Jack FM]] rolled back?
-[[User:Csw134|Csw134]] ([[User talk:Csw134|talk]]) 21:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
-:As per the edit comment in the article text, and per the [[WP:EL|external links guideline]], ''"Only add web sites for radio stations that do not have existing Wikipedia articles"''. The stations that have Wikipedia articles already have those links in the respective articles; as we are not a directory service, we do not repeat the links in the list article. Hope this helps. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 21:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
-== Heroes change ==
-The two actors I changed WERE main characters in the first season.  They are also both listed as main characters in the second season yet they barely had a role in it.  The other main character I added to the list Molly Walker was in all three seasons being one of the main characters in the 2nd and not a main character in the 1st and 3rd.  The information that i added WAS correct and should not have been changed  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kevw731|Kevw731]] ([[User talk:Kevw731|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kevw731|contribs]]) 00:07, 8 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:Please read through the talk page archives, as it will help to explain this common misunderstanding. "Main character" status is decided by the network and the series producer, ''not'' by the opinions of fans or Wikipedia editors. The roles of Sylar and Ando were not considered "main" roles in the first season, but both actors were promoted to that status in the second season. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 03:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
-==Dexter TV series==
-I reverted it again and I think it should be left there and discussed on the article's talk page, since several editors have agreed that the show is extremely similar to the work of [[Brett Easton Ellis]] and references it on several episodes.TomCat4680 (talk) 08:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
-:Please discuss this further on the article's talk page.I refuse to talk to you directly until the matter is resolved with a consensus of other editors.[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 08:31, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
-::I never said I owned the article. All I said was I started that section. Further posts on my page will be considered harrassment and reported to a moderator.[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 08:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
-::Yeah well you may be a moderator that doesn't mean you don't have to follow the rules too. I created a discussion of the disputed content [[Talk:Dexter (TV series)#Bret Easton Ellis section|here]] and I strongly urge you and anyone else to contribute to it and reach a consensus of the disputed material before removing it again.[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 08:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
-::No, you can't tell me what to do, so I'm going to leave the info up. I put a header on the section that says the content has been disputed and invited everyone to discuss and reach a consensus. Please [[Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith|assume good faith]] and stop making unsubstantiated claims against me and discuss the content at the above link like I asked, per Wiki policy.[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 08:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
-::I moved the disputed section to the talk page. Thank you for reasoning with me and not 3RRing me. Have another cookie.[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 09:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
-<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Choco chip cookie.jpg|100px|left]]
-[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) has given you a [[cookie]]! Cookies promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!  <br />
-Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{tls|Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{tls|munch}}!
-{{clear}}
-</div><!-- Template:Cookie -->[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 09:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
-== Review Submissions ==
-Hi Ckatz,
-I recently emailed the head of music at wikipedia and he confirmed it was perfectly acceptable for me to post links to reviews at Sun On The Sand, as they add to articles, especially in instances where an album has one or two reviews. With that in mind, please can you not undo the changes I make to album page articles.
-Thank you,
-Ben Greenbank.  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bengreenbank|Bengreenbank]] ([[User talk:Bengreenbank|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bengreenbank|contribs]]) 21:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:Ben, thanks for your note. I would be curious to know who you emailed, as there is no "head of music" at Wikipedia. (The entire site is run as a collaborative effort.) Beyond that, the external links guideline generally suggests that we do not link to sites just because they mention a particular subject; there must be a specific benefit to the article. Many, many websites publish reviews, but that does not mean that ''every'' review site should be listed. Is there any particular reason why you feel "Sun on the Sand" is especially notable? (Keep in mind that this is ''not'' a comment on the quality of the site, only a question as to why it should be one of the few that do get listed.) --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 22:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
-I emailed the press link on the contact page and was contacted by Lodewijk Gelauff who gave me permission to submit my reviews to album pages. As for why I think we should be allowed to do so. First and foremost, not to come across as too arrogant, I feel we have talented writers who write great reviews. We are notable in that we have many contacts will significant record labels such as Sony and Universal. We are given pre-release copies of the albums they and many other record labels release. We have interviews will prominant artists and we have a very respectable Alexa traffic rank.  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bengreenbank|Bengreenbank]] ([[User talk:Bengreenbank|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bengreenbank|contribs]]) 23:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-== Spider-Man ==
-Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article [[Spider-Man]], I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the [[Talk:Spider-Man/GA1|review page]], and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 01:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)