User talk:Coco2791

January 2017

At present, that article Resonate (East Asian culture website) does not contain any references to independent sources, nor any other evidence that the web site is significant or important enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. I suggest looking at Wikipedia's notability guidelines to see the sort of thing which is needed. If evidence of significance and notability is not produced soon, the article is likely to be deleted.
My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Resonate (East Asian culture website)

The article Resonate (East Asian culture website) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources. No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]