Jump to content

User talk:Coconut818/Women in conservatism in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer Review[edit]

The article’s status is semi-complete. The article covers some important info that adds to the main wiki page. The Goldwater campaign section is very well written and has great sources and wiki links. Both sections keep a very good neutral tone that doesn’t try to convince the reader of anything. The sources are good too, except for one Vogue article (reference 15) that might need to be changed. Most of the aspects that can be improved are content focused. For the Goldwater campaign section it might be beneficial to add anything about how these women are mostly white, it says middleclass suburban but they were mostly white. It could be helpful to include a little more detail somewhere in the article about the religious nature of conservative women. For the Aliza section: I am a little confused on how the survey findings relate to conservative pushback to Metoo. It's important info but adding a connection to how those survey findings affect women of different political parties and how they relate to MeToo should be added for clarity. Additionally, more details should be added about Barrett's specific conservative values/why she is considered conservative as it's a section about women in conservatism and not all about Barrett. Clearer language about Barrett's views would be helpful. One last thing to note, there is one source that has multiple different references (1-6), make sure it’s only referenced once! I would say the article is pretty well-developed. Aliza’s section has some content gaps but in general it's pretty good. Ivy&Fern2003 (talk) 02:54, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

. Ivy&Fern2003 (talk) 02:12, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]