User talk:Codebear

Welcome...

Hello, Codebear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Or should that be "welcome back"? If not, this is an extremely belated welcome ... but a sincere one. Thank you for your contributions.

Here are some pages we recommend for new editors. I guess you've already read at least some of these, but I'll list them anyway, just in case.

If you need help, you can check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! CWC 14:37, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Chris! It has been a very long time and I was glad I could help in this small way. The pointers are exactly what I was needing yesterday :) Codebear (talk) 17:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied

Per your off-wiki request: User:Codebear/Kevin Marks. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Goblet

History part... It's not because it's not "neutral" but because it's funny and then I tagged it.. Ueutyi (talk) 02:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ueutyi I get that it's funny, but that is the history of how they got the name - i'm still confused as to why that makes it not neutral Codebear (talk) 02:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paraphrase it to make it more "proper".. Ueutyi (talk) 02:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ueutyi ah! I see the point your making, thanks for being patient with me -- edited the article to remove the block quote completely and to reference the story in a more (hopefully) neutral manner Codebear (talk) 02:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what I meant. You can't actually copy that text from your reference... I filled in two bare references using MakeRef and if I accidentally removed a reference of yours, simply add it back. Ueutyi (talk) 02:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ueutyi thanks for the references fix - I did not know about MakeRef(!) -- everything looks good now, is there any process to getting the tag removed or will you swing back around and clean that out later? Codebear (talk) 02:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, if you want just remove it. Ueutyi (talk) 02:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet! thanks! Codebear (talk) 02:52, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Broken Goblet Brewing Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Broken Goblet Brewing Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken Goblet Brewing Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Broken Goblet Brewing Company logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Broken Goblet Brewing Company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]