User talk:CompleteThisEncyclopedia

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CompleteThisEncyclopedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey there James, I do not understand how my account has been blocked, I have never had any other account except for this one. The CPSA put in a request on the UK Wikipedians Notice Board, and I followed out a task to make a List of English Sport Shooters, I made a page that had previously been deleted, Ian Farnworth, a shooter from the North West. I believe I have been wrongly accused of misbehaving, please, I love Wikipedia and have contributed some to it, but never have I vandalised it, I wish for my suspension to be lifted please, as I was only carrying out a task of creating an article about a request person. Thanks for understanding.

Decline reason:

Your editing matches the pattern of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RealDanMan14/Archive. Sandstein 19:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've requested comment by the blocking admin since it's not clear to me on what grounds this user is suspected of socking. Sandstein 17:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the sock investigation page, this passes the duck test easily. Even the structure of the username is the same as usual for this user. Hairhorn (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, thanks. Unblock request declined. Sandstein 19:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CompleteThisEncyclopedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fair enough that I match the description of those editors, but I was given a task to do, what is wrong with adding Ian Farnworth/Dan Farnworth to Jules Sobrian's page? I have contributed fairly and not made fun of anyone or anything, I am only filling in information that is missing. If you live in Lancashire, you will realize Ian Farnworth is a well known person, I mean, almost as well known as Trevor Hemmings. Please, I love Wikipedia, can you please allow me to have my account back? And if not, can someone make, even a small page, for Ian Farnworth? Thanks alot again Hairhorn, Sandstein and James.

Decline reason:

If you want an account back, go back to your original account and wait. WP:SOCK is never permitted - once blocked, it's you, the person who are blocked. As to article specifics, I would assume they fail the notability guidelines. If you were "tasked" to create an article, it's pretty good chance that you have such massive conflict of interest that you should never go near the article (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.