User talk:Connorx

Welcome!

Hello, Connorx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NickelShoe 16:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Against band

Against band has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this band might not be notable enough for an article. Please review the relevant guidelines at WP:MUSIC. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. NickelShoe 16:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 03:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Gladstone

Bruce Gladstone has been proposed for deletion. It is believed that this article is a hoax. --Descendall 10:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arkanuk Obesh

Arkanuk Obesh has been proposed for deletion. It is believed that this article is a hoax. --Descendall 10:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Namuh

Namuh has been proposed for deletion. It is believed that this article is a hoax. --Descendall 10:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Latsaoc

Latsaoc has been proposed for deletion. It is believed that this article is a hoax. --Descendall 10:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Carrigan

Keith Carrigan been proposed for deletion. It is believed that this article is a hoax. --Descendall 10:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arkanuk Obesh

Please wait with the removal of the AfD message from Arkanuk Obesh until the issue is settled. And please provide evidence that it's not a hoax. -- Koffieyahoo 10:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Carrigan

Do not, under any circumstances, remove the AfD tag from Keith Carrigan. Doing so is considerd vandalism, and can get you banned. --Descendall 10:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD tags

Do not under any circumstances remove the AfD tags placed on your articles! If you want them removed please provide pointers to written evidence (books, websites, etc.) which describes the contents of the disputed articles. -- Koffieyahoo 08:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. This in reference to this edit. --Descendall 19:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. This in reference to this edit. --Descendall 19:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices and comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This in reference to this edit. --Descendall 19:29, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Be warned you are already in violation of the three-revert rule. This in reference to this edit. --Descendall 19:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. This in reference to this edit. --Descendall 19:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. This in reference to this edit. --Descendall 19:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices and comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This in reference to this edit. --Descendall 19:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Be warned you are already in violation of the three-revert rule. This in reference to this edit. --Descendall 19:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. This in reference to this edit. --Descendall 19:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Goonsack, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Xiahou 02:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]