User talk:Crossmedia20

Nomination of Yogesh Bhateja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yogesh Bhateja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogesh Bhateja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Amkgp 💬 18:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Jagdeep singh bittu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a sockpuppet of Jagdeep singh bittu

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crossmedia20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, this account is not a sockpuppet of Jagdeep singh bittu and because of his same general area of interest and edits, it does not mean that I am a sockpuppet user. I don't know the user Jagdeep singh bittu. You can check his edits and my edits. Nothing common would be found. Edits made by me are informative and not vandalising and affecting Wikipedia in any kind. However, edits made by Jagdeep singh bittu are violating Wikipedia norms and policies. Being a new user to this encyclopedia, I might have made a few mistakes but administrators are there to guide and help. Notably, edit or pages created by me are also being checked and commented by substantial users. My most of the edits survived because substantial users know that it is must to be added for better information in Wikipedia space. I have read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and would request to go for WP:Check so that user IPs could be tracked. I am a manager of a few artists (singers and actors) associated with Punjabi music industry and creating their required notability on cloud space is my task. Not violating Wikipedia policy of paid contribution disclosure, I had mentioned it on my talk page since beginning. Because of Jagdeep singh bittu's mistakes, I am suffering a lot. I would request you to unblock me and remove deletion tags from pages created, so that I could continue contributing good and informative edits for the encyclopedia, thanks Crossmedia20 (talk) 08:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you are not a sockpuppet you will need to explain the evidence here. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 09:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Evidence of not a sockpuppet of Jagdeep singh bittu

(writing User: Voice of Clam I am not able to edit any page for now as due to blocked id. So allow me to explain and share the evidence here. Firstly, I joined Wikipedia on 11 December 2020, and my first edit was on Carry the Kettle Nakoda First Nation. However, Jagdeep singh bittu joined in September 2020. Since then, he created different ids with the similar names, veer jagdeep, Raju singh chabhal, chabhal, Kulwant singh chabhal, Satnam singh chabhal, Teshan chabhal, chabhal da boys, Mahala singh.

Notably, the sockpuppet has no knowledge of copyright violation of using images. Despite facing copyright violations, sockpuppets, Mahala singh, Teshan Chabhal and veerjagdeep tried to insert copyrighted images on Sharry Mann page. When the user came to know that he is being caught by administrators because of his similar names and edits on same pages, he created ids with the names, Roupinder, This Punjabi, Jagroop maan (similar name to Jagdeep), Jaat mate, DJ flow, oyephe123.

All these accounts have tried to vandalise Wikipedia by uploading copyright images and edits on all most common pages. It shows that the user don't want to learn about Wikipedia:Image use policy, Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry and . He keep creating new ids to vandalise the encyclopedia, uploading copyrighted images, new ids and editing semi-protected pages.

If I, crossmedia20 is a sockpuppet of Jagdeep singh bittu, then I would have edit pages that jagdeep singh bittu and his sockpuppets worked on but no page is common except Amrit Maan. Jagdeep bittu tried to upload copyrighted image but I added information in the discography column. It was just because of same general interests, administrators are thinking crossmedia20 as sockpuppet of jagdeep. In the beginning, I made a mistake by adding copyrighted image on Himanshi Khurana but soon after going through Wikipedia:CV , I understood and did not tried to again upload any unwanted material. The blocked user jagdeep singh bittu has had a very little knowledge about the Wikipedia as he never tried to understand copyright violation policy, never clarified or interacted with editors/administrators on his talk page. The sockpuppets jagdeep singh bittu, chabhal da boys, oyephe123, chabhal, DJ flow, Teshan Chabhal have tried a number of times to vandalise page Amrit Maan by adding copyright violation images. MOST IMPORTANTLY, the common and notable thing among sockpuppets of jagdeep singh bittu is that they have always made mobile edits from mobile web.

I hope I have shared enough number of evidence. I believe that administrators will understand that having general and common interest did not make anyone any other's sockpuppet. I would request for WP:CHECK if admns still wants more evidence. Pls unblock crossmedia20, thanks. Crossmedia20 (talk) 10:48, 10 January 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

Please submit another unblock request, and another administrator will review it. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 13:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of not a sockpuppet of Jagdeep singh bittu

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crossmedia20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please allow me to explain and share the evidence here. Firstly, I joined Wikipedia on 11 December 2020, and my first edit was on Carry the Kettle Nakoda First Nation. However, Jagdeep singh bittu joined in September 2020. Since then, he created different ids with the similar names, veer jagdeep, Raju singh chabhal, chabhal, Kulwant singh chabhal, Satnam singh chabhal, Teshan chabhal, chabhal da boys, Mahala singh.

Notably, the sockpuppet has no knowledge of copyright violation of using images. Despite facing copyright violations, sockpuppets, Mahala singh, Teshan Chabhal and veerjagdeep tried to insert copyrighted images on Sharry Mann page. When the user came to know that he is being caught by administrators because of his similar names and edits on same pages, he created ids with the names, Roupinder, This Punjabi, Jagroop maan (similar name to Jagdeep), Jaat mate, DJ flow, oyephe123.

All these accounts have tried to vandalise Wikipedia by uploading copyright images and edits on all most common pages. It shows that the user don't want to learn about Wikipedia:Image use policy, Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry and . He keep creating new ids to vandalise the encyclopedia, uploading copyrighted images, new ids and editing semi-protected pages.

If I, crossmedia20 is a sockpuppet of Jagdeep singh bittu, then I would have edit pages that jagdeep singh bittu and his sockpuppets worked on but no page is common except Amrit Maan. Jagdeep bittu tried to upload copyrighted image but I added information in the discography column. It was just because of same general interests, administrators are thinking crossmedia20 as sockpuppet of jagdeep singh bittu. In the beginning, I made a mistake by adding copyrighted image on Himanshi Khurana but soon after going through Wikipedia:CV , I understood and did not tried to again upload any unwanted material. The blocked user jagdeep singh bittu has had a very little knowledge about the Wikipedia as he never tried to understand copyright violation policy, never clarified or interacted with editors/administrators on his talk page. The sockpuppets jagdeep singh bittu, chabhal da boys, oyephe123, chabhal, DJ flow, Teshan Chabhal have tried a number of times to vandalise page Amrit Maan by adding copyright violation images. MOST IMPORTANTLY, the common and notable thing among sockpuppets of jagdeep singh bittu is that they have always made mobile edits from mobile web. I have created and made edits keeping Wikipedia policies in mind. Notably, edit or pages created by me are also being checked and commented by substantial users. My most of the edits survived because substantial users know that it is must to be added for better information in Wikipedia space.

I hope I have shared enough number of evidence. I believe that administrators will understand that having general and common interest did not make anyone any other's sockpuppet. I would request for WP:CHECK if admns still wants more evidence. Pls unblock crossmedia20, thanks. Crossmedia20 (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. ST47 (talk) 06:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.