User talk:CyberMew

Speedy deletion of Cosmology@Home

A tag has been placed on Cosmology@Home, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Toddstreat1 12:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] sounds interesting CyberMew. Why don't you do the article again, but tell us a lot more about it. It disappeared before I could 'hangon' it Mannafredo 12:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to but I am new to this wiki stuff. I only wanted to start a simple page to start it off and let other users contribute to the article. But it seems that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ryan_Postlethwaite does not appreciate that fact and deletes article just because "it does not asserts significance". I hope he see this reply, so that he, as a degree holder, is able to make a significance to the article. If not, I can easily be an admin as well lol, why not make me a article deleter?

What I am trying to say that instead of deleting potential articles, why not he himself add on to the article?