User talk:DAngeles

Notability of Evan D'Angeles

A tag has been placed on Evan D'Angeles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add self-promotional external links to existing articles. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, please do not insist on promoting yourself and please do not remove deletion notices from any article which you create yourself. This is not the place to tell of your accomplishments. What you're doing is tantamount to vandalism of the site; at the very least, it's seriously disrupting it. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you've continued to edit this piece not two minutes after I asked you nicely not to. For your benefit, I strongly suggest that you read WP:BIO and WP:NOT. Your actions ay lead to a permanent loss of your edit privileges. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:37, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, you are on the verge of a 3RR violation. I am asking you for your own sake to kindly not mistreat this site and to please stop promoting yourself. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Evan D'Angeles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Evan D'Angeles. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Enigma ^msg! 06:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]