User talk:Dale Wvr
John D. Roush
[edit]I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article John D. Roush, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dina 18:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
My response -> See Discussion page under John D. Roush
Hi, you seem to be intent on taking this redirect and changing it into a disambiguation page. I disagree that this is necessary, but I went ahead and formatted it correctly. You then reverted my changes with the edit summary "MediaWiki bug - two people editing causes loss of prior edit". This is not accurate. Please read Wikipedia's disambiguation guidelines before reverting back to your incorrectly formatted version. Thanks. Dina 18:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
My Response -> Possibly my mistake on the editing problem. At first glance it looked like we were both editing it at the same time, and my updates were not recorded, so un reverted and re-did the work... doing such reverted the chage you made at the same time. Thanks for the correction to Disambig, as such is very clear to me now.
Nomination of John D. Roush for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John D. Roush until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.