User talk:Daliborsky

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Daliborsky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 13:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, Daliborsky. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pegasus EDA 100 Flamingo, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ahunt (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

flamingo

hi,

yes, I'm afiliated, but my edits are factual and totaly neutral, since I know WIKI is about knowledge, not propaganda. So I can solomnly confirm, that the numbers I've put are pure facts. I would not exercise propaganda and false claims even in wildest dreams. I'm not that kind of person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daliborsky (talk • contribs)

Thanks for your note and for indicating that you are affiliated with the company that produces the aircraft. As per WP:V we still need verifiable sources to change the aircraft data however. As I noted before, perhaps you could have the company publish their specs and news on a website and then we can use that to update the article. The company will probably want to create a website about the aircraft design soon anyway as a marketing initiative. - Ahunt (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]