User talk:DanielPlainfield

January 2013

Hello, I'm BadSynergy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BadSynergy (talk) 06:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I suggest you read wikipedia policices before engaging in editing the aritcles you have. please read wp:consensus, wp:nor, wp:rs, wp:verifiable, wp:npov and wp:truth sources regard rangers as a new club and also the same club, the football authority class them as the same club wikipedia only states wha tthe sources state and as such that is what it is doing. i also suggest you if you have any other accounts you dnt use them again as you could be up for [wp:spi]] which would involve a banAndrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 23:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, let's start with your changes to the David Murray page. Nowhere in the BBC source does it say, 'Murray's 23-year association with the liquidated Rangers football club is notable for the success the team had on the field as well as the financial challenges that ultimately led to its liquidation in 2012 and the end of its 140 year history.' Also I should point out current consensus on Rangers is that it is the same club.

Next is the changes to Ally McCoist page. Again, after reading the source it was contradicting what you had wrote. If you believe a page is wrong bring it up in the talk page first otherwise changes will normally end up reverted.

I hope this has answered your queries and if not just leave a message.

Thanks BadSynergy (talk) 01:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Accurate Sources and No Bias

I found it amusing your choice of headline, especially when your edits to aforementioned pages and what you said on my talk page display a certain bias. I'll keep this brief, when you add sources they are backing up what you have put. You wrote, 'Murray's 23-year association with the liquidated Rangers football club is notable for the success the team had on the field as well as the financial challenges that ultimately led to its liquidation in 2012 and the end of its 140 year history.' And I as pointed out to you nowhere in the source you provided did it say, 'end of its 140 year history'. That's your POV and that is why it was reverted. Same can again be said about changes made to McCoist page.

I mentioned consensus for a reason it took many months, with constant debating to reach our decision on the status of Rangers FC. That is why I mentioned taking issues you have to talk pages first rather than just changing pages. BadSynergy (talk) 17:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC)