User talk:Danisalv/Dark web

READY FOR GRADING

I still want to expand more on what is in the content page. I believe that sections like terrorism, the illegal porn trade, social media, financing, and hacking groups need to be expanded on a bit.

The smaller sections such as botnets, fraud services and phishing scams can either be combined with each other or already existing groups.

Also still need to take out any non-relevant or confusing information such as the "puzzles" section.

Make sure you aren't publishing "batch edits". You should not make multiple substantive changes and then publish them all at once, you need to publish and describe those changes as you go. Beyond that however you have already made a lot of good additions. I would just add a citation for this addition: "[Specialist Clearweb news sites such as DeepDotWeb and All Things Vice provide news coverage and practical information about dark web sites and services. However DeepDotWeb was shut down by authorities in 2019. The Hidden Wiki and its mirrors and forks hold some of the largest directories of content at any given time. Popular sources of dark web .onion links include Pastebin, YouTube, Twitter, Reddit and other Internet forums.]" but other than than the rest of your plan is good if ambitious. I wouldn't try to do everything, but make yourself a prioritized list of things you want to accomplish before you move your work to live wikipedia.Adrishaw (talk) 22:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore comment above about "add a citation for this addition". Looking more closely at the draft and exisitng article I see that is cited in the existing wikipedia article. Adrishaw (talk) 14:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only one Wikipedian made a comment about one of my sources being "unusable". They thought I was using information from the source, however, I was just using the headline as an example since the source is considered a mainstream media outlet. I reverted the changes and explained this in the comment section. A new wikipedian pluggedd in a new headline and source in place of mine which I am okay with since it still serves the purpose of the sentence it was used in. April 21, 2021