User talk:Dayv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi there Dayv. Thought I'd roll out the unofficial wikipedia red carpet to you (as well as the official one which will go down below somewhere). Hope you enjoy the place, and if there's anything I can do... Anilocra - (hi!) 23:22, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Hello, Dayv, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Anilocra 23:22, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jamie Kane[edit]

In light of your comments in the discussion, I suggest revisiting the article and then revisiting the discussion. Uncle G 00:20:58, 2005-08-15 (UTC)

thanks for the edits[edit]

Thanks for the grammatically edits to the pages business plot and smedley butler--people like you make my poor grammar contributions sound encyclopedic. THANKS! Travb 16:24, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Re:Deleted Article[edit]

The article was deleted as a copy and paste from a website. Being a year later, which one my memory cannot recollect.

We must delete copyright violations as we see them to remove their history from the logs, as keeping them would imply that they are properly licensed when they are not. As such, stubbing such an article and keeping the history is not an option.

Now, having an article deleted does not mean that it cannot be recreated. Feel free to aid in expanding Wikipedia's compendium of information and let me know if I can assist you in any way. Keegan (talk) 03:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Administrators have the capability of deleting and then restoring an article with the offending edits hidden from "visible" history logs. These deleted revisions are still available for other administrators to see and serve in the capacity of tracing what may be problematic/systemic copyright violations. This is different from the Oversight function, which will permanently suppress and/or hide a particular revision. Generally copyright violations are just straight out deleted to leave the paper trail in tact for other administrators. Keegan (talk) 04:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)