User talk:Dev1 0302/Propylparaben
Peer review from Section 109
[edit]- Overall, excellent work and good progress is being made.
-The content is well written; no major grammatical or spelling changes.
-Good idea for the image.
-Sections are well constructed and organized.
-May want to review the references; they seem to be out of order.
-Once your scheme is in, you may want to explain the reaction stepwise whilst referring to the scheme.
-The chemical properties section and health risks section have sentences that aren't directly related right beside each other. I think that might be fine for a wikipedia article, but it may be something to consider. KTCpscChem (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)