User talk:Dialectic~enwiki

Kundalini yoga and DNA's double helix

You may as well remove the Dialectic reference if you don't recognize the *about*, and not *exact* of synthesis patterns. The helix model in RNA and DNA is often cross-referenced in the thesis>antithesis>synthesis process. Hypotheses of development from youth to adult is correlated to kundalini development as well. I'd go into physics relativity; but I prefer not to be *exactly* suppressed. Thank you for your potential.. Dialectic 05:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused, are you upset with me for removing them? I admit, I am no expert on Kundalini so I may not understand the significance... or are you saying I should remove Dialectic from Kundalini? Feel free too if that was what you wanted, unfortunately I was not familiar with the term so I assumed it might be of some significance to the article *shrug*. Do you practise K-yoga? Tyciol 17:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for stating that you are not familiar with Kundalini. Those of us who do exercise it prefer others that do not - not erase our expression through the honorable form of this Open Source work. --Dialectic 21:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No need to talk in plural or third person, you're upset I removed DNA or whatever. I just don't see what the link is, because there isn't one. Can you explain it? DNA is not a part of Kundalini teachings at all. That they both have a double helix is merely coincidence. Tyciol 14:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No relativity?.. Then why compare anything?.. Why ask why?.. Why not delete every entry on Wikipedia without inquiry?.. Why not suppress all open interaction?.. Thank you for your potential.. --Dialectic 20:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is okay to mention in the Kundalini article that Kundalini yogis note the similarity of kundalini scripture with that of the double helix discovered by James Watson. Referring to it in the article is fine, just not at the bottom of the article under 'See also', as it is not a directly related topic. Kind of like how in Naruto the word anime is mentioned, but it is not linked to at the bottom, only things that are of direct relation or a subcategory, like lists of characters or powers. Tyciol 21:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I bow to open exploration of valuable synthesis.. even the flexing of spacetime modelled in Relativity is compared to Kundalini; as well as NLP and patterned writing/speech, etc. ... Similarly; all objects have a dialectic pattern involved in the synthesis process.. This is an emerging study, and an honorable exploration.. I bow to your integrity and magnificence!.. --Dialectic 21:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dialectic. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dialectic~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)