User talk:Dickerson.219/sandbox
Instructor Comments No. 2[edit]
Well-written[edit]
- Needs writing in subsections
- Hoping to see more information on the history of it.
- Instead of using quotes, rephrase, summarize and simplify it.
- Revitalization should be under history
- Neighborhood Plans can be under history
Verifiable with no original research[edit]
- No issues here.
Broad in its coverage[edit]
- Again, would like to see some reorganization
Neutral[edit]
- No issues here.
Stable[edit]
- No Comments.
Illustrated[edit]
- Fill in places where photos should go, but don't code them as galleries. That is distracting.
164.107.47.208 (talk) 17:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Kenitzer.1 (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Columbus, City Of, "Near Southside Area Plan 2011." Columbus.gov. 29 Nov. 2011. Web. 12 Nov. 2014. <http://columbus.gov/uploadedFiles/Columbus/Departments/Development/Planning_Division/Document_Library/Library_Documents/PDFs/NearSouthsideAreaPlan(1).pdf>.
"Healthy Neighborhoods." Healthy Neighborhoods. Web. 12 Nov. 2014. <http://www.healthyneighborhoods.org/>.
Good Outline, but I was hoping for more content so its difficult for me to provide comments.
- Good Pickup on Livingston Park on John's Page. Combine both of your pages onto this one or his. It will make your lives easier.
- Instead of quoting so much from pages, try to figure out a way to streamline it.
- Demographics: Good information, but where is it from? What year? If it's City-Data, I'd suggest you use the Census not them. I don't like City Data
- Check out the Dispatch - lots of good info about Near South Neighborhoods there.
- Look at Sanborn and Baist Atlas maps to see if you can figure out the old subdivisions and what the area looked like historically.
Kenitzer.1 (talk) 20:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)